Acasă Baldrick (GB1) Comentarii

Baldrick (GB1)

Utilizator
Baldrick (GB1)
Vizite
3
Roluri
Fara roluri
Inregistrat
Ultima data activ
Puncte
106
Insigne
12
Postarii
4,948

Comentarii

  • What? Nobody was unhappy and wanted to leave, TDDM were imploded by their own and Brian ran to CG for support. You have missed out the third club in that analogy, which isn't particularly good anyways. EDIT: For you USA visitors, that's soccer he's talking about.
  • PJboi, we have about the same as Dark Union/Dark Wanderers/TDDM had up until Sunday. Centres of power will ALWAYS be in the hands of the strongest, that is the same for all servers. That is how the game works. The ice capitals were held by smaller alliances at one point, and they didn't want them. They provide no benefit…
  • Hey Warhero, sorry, but you obviously don't know that much about the game if you think all capitals have worth. Apart from the grass capitals, the rest are worthless, simple kudos items. Funny that everyone seems to think that BSK with three alliances are somehow wrong to want two capitals when the Dark family had exactly…
  • Is that your version of a printscreen Roy? Nice photoshopping. You missed out an E.
  • You really don't understand this game, do you? Or this server for that matter. What makes you think we would even attempt to take someone else's capital? Have we ever done this in the past? Fact is, capitals ALWAYS end up in the hands of the strongest. That is how they work, and when they end up in the hands of an alliance…
  • I'll say it again, this is not a war, this is a capital assault in motion. CG have, by their own admission, entered into this willingly, knowing what is coming their way. Nobody can call that bullying, even if the entire server was attacking them, because they are holding the prize, and that is what is causing this to…
  • You just don't get it do you fresh? This isn't a war, this is a capital assault in motion. They are two very different things. If you don't understand that, then you don't understand Empire. EDIT: TDU have been involved in multi-alliance attacks on single alliances in the past, so yes, you are wrong.
  • There are no rules fresh, only agreements between alliances. TDDM ended that agreement when they tried to take ours. As far as you calling BSK bullies goes, maybe you should have a think about your alliance's history, and then come back and tell us if you still want to be saying that? By calling this situation one that…
  • I have never said that capitals should not be taken, why would you think that? Really, stop posting nonsense and come up with some facts. To explain,we had a long standing agreement with the other capital holding alliances that if anyone tried to cap one, we would help each other out. That included TDDM, the alliance who…
  • Sorry, it was not a TDU capital, it was TDDMs, their own wing alliance who they tried to steal it off. As far as I know, 10 generals were booted, the ones who had all the passwords as I was informed, so they could not support it. This information came from TDU by the way. TDDM attempted to plan to take ours not so long…
  • Other capital holders? Like, all two of them? lol One of them is fighting with us, and the other one is the alliance who booted half their wing in order to sneak in a failed capture on the one you now have. For their good? lol You're gonna have to do better than that.
  • Why is it not right? What has changed since Sunday to make a three alliance family with two capitals so wrong? You are already opening gates on more than 50% of our attacks, how long do you really think you can keep up the pace? You have willingly entered into a war that you cannot win, but you are so stubborn you can't…
  • lol at the complaints. So, those players who used to be in a three alliance family with two capitals are now complaining because we are at war with their new home because we plan to have two capitals for our three alliance family? Seriously? What has changed in the last three days? It was fine then, but wrong now? Also,…
  • Most important question that needs answering: If a player enters this "eventdom", will they be required to compete forever, or can they decide on a monthly basis whether to continue, or leave? I can't imagine the horror of a never ending berimond with a new camp to build each month. Berimond is a whole lot of fun, but in…
  • No, that is something similar, but not the same offer. this offer is exclusive and only offered to ruby whales, we know that now as GGS have informed us this is how it works. Close, but no cigar!
  • Given that there are resource islands, I would imagine the base production is low. Either the same as RVs or more probably like food in Berimond, the more you have, the more you get. No idea really, but I doubt it will be anything like the Great empire, so the majority of players will probably struggle to hold troops. Just…
  • so that makes it an event, not a kingdom. I'm still not sure what it all means, but if you think about it, once you join, and the event resets, GGS would have a captive audience, unable to escape. Build or lose. Seems legit to me. Some further information on this would be appreciated. this would also tie in nicely with the…
  • Wow, so we are all stuck in there forever, but have to build anew castle once a month? No thanks. A monthly Berimond you have to play whether you like it or not? Think I'll give it a miss.
  • So, an ongoing, repeating event that is in a kingdom? Sounds interesting, but if it is anywhere near as fast paced and time consuming as Berimond, that is a lot of effort for all involved. One thing I would like confirmed is whether we need to rebuild our castles each time it resets? I know that sounds a bit silly, but at…
  • Ethan already told us that this is a new thing, and that they are testing offering exclusive items to a limited number of players. What he hasn't admitted to as yet, as far as I can see, is that the offers are only going out to the ruby whales, which means that the concept of free to play, but spend to get better is no…