smithy92
- Username
- smithy92
- Visits
- 0
- Roles
- No Roles
- Joined
- Last Active
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 106
Comments
-
stupid thing is Greenwaves, im not after RL money. I would happily settle for in-game gold currency to compensate me for wasting time on building units they have nerfed. As this wouldnt even cost them anything, i really dont see what the problem is?
-
who says Jesters dont have any power? :P If you control the morale of an alliance you control the whole spirit of an alliance lol
-
expecting anyone from GGS to do something morale boosting is as good an idea as trusting a blind hemophiliac baby with a knife juggling act :)
-
thanks for the link Xelan :) I see nothing on terms and conditions that says GGS can change aspect games on will and we have to just "suck it up" as appears to be the running theme of response.
-
If updates are releases, usually the consumer gets the ability to accept or decline the update - therefore being able to keep their older version if they think its more use. Also users get a T&C sheet to agree to before updates, where consumers agree to accept changes. Additionally the point must be made this isnt a…
-
Hey Eric, Sadly i know the odds are against us and we most likely wont get compensation - doesnt change the fact its our consumer right to it and i will keep pushing for it as GGS has done us wrong so massively. The amusing thing is im not asking for rubies here - ruby expenditure to double recruitment of vet swords i…
-
I would like to thank everyone for their comments so far on this post - i know GGS has seemed to have dismissed our claims so far, but thank you everyone for keeping a cool head - the important thing is that we dont let this thread become a moan at GGS but instead keep a calm and logical arguments as to how this recent…
-
Hey Ethan, i Thank you for your response i really do. But i have to say i agree with cashman - if features are "in development" or trial mode then players should be alerted to this factor when services are first made available. As it is as a server we said these units would be edited eventually and the official word was no…
-
honestly if you think going 50 miles out is a chore for RVs... you will struggle in this game. some of my RVs are 300 odd miles away. You want to get to those rvs first, stables are only way to do it... just a shame about the ruby cost. A cheaper alternative, a "speed commander" will at least improve your chances a bit :)
-
i cant believe we still havent had a response from Ethan about this?
-
you be polite, they ignore you, you moan, they ignore you. so for a change i put some proper legal/official jargon in there. If you read my opening message it was far from a moan but a break down of how exactly GGS has failed to provide the service that we have subscribed for and what is the expected typical response as…
-
so to sum up your position bubala, we should stop moaning about getting GGE to do something to sort out the mess for us that they make... but you agree GGE should do something to sort out the messes they make?
-
you realise it is kinda funny to ask alliances such as BSK or epicness not to underestimate your "esteemed alliance" that or to a degree so small scale i havent even heard of you before? Just saying... Please, this thread is to focus on the edit to vet swords. Unless you have any personal experience with these units…
-
i was going to reply to the annoying one on this thread... but to be frank i couldnt put it better than you just did sam4, thank you
-
bubala999... i dont even know where to start with your statements :) this isnt a game where we get to just press reload a checkpoint when things dont go right. This is a game for lots of us that we PAY to PLAY. And when you are spending money on any sort of service, certain things are expected of those supplying said…
-
So nice to see we all agree compensation is needed! cant wait for word from Ethan on this?
-
completely agree with what you said here :) if we arent being compensated for what we have spent, at least current units should keep their original stats until they are used up or something of the sort
-
Hey Ethan, I appreciate you taking time to comment here, really thank you :) Additionally i understand the idea may be a no-go in its current suggested layout, but even if edited in some way to fit more into a GGE mindset - whether that means reducing rubies earned or making it MORE difficult and challenging... i still…
-
i think a lot of people are caught up on the idea that you would be able to earn enough rubies that you would no longer need to buy them... with this idea im genuinely on about gaining so few rubies that for a ruby player its a laughable amount. but for a non ruby player, its a few extra ruby tools or puts them closer to…
-
so no one else got views on this...? :)