We need new Moderators!
We are always on the lookout for talented people to join the team. That means you! If you think you could help us organise and inform the community while entertaining everyone then apply. We need people to help out on the forum, behind the scenes with announcements, on Discord and on our other Social Media channels.
If this is something you think might be of interest to you, HERE
Leveling the Balance of the high Ruby ruby vs Lesser Ruby player in the game
HeroAzure (US1)
US1 Posts: 231
1) An attacker should lose honor if he loses. At least as much as he would gain if he won.
2) Stop reducing honor when gates are opened.
3) When there is a rank or level difference that is significant then do not let them take food.
4) If they lose increase the losers flank by 15% for retaliation attacks.
2) Stop reducing honor when gates are opened.
3) When there is a rank or level difference that is significant then do not let them take food.
4) If they lose increase the losers flank by 15% for retaliation attacks.
HeroAzure @ usa 1
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Art by Sam Hurt, Title Cactus Cat
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Art by Sam Hurt, Title Cactus Cat
0
Comments
Musks
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Art by Sam Hurt, Title Cactus Cat
#2 - Disagree. Open gates = loss. Same results should apply. That no troops are lost and no fires lit, is a great benefit already.
#3 - Disagree. Most common reasons for hits, outside of wars, are Glory Hits and Farming. Annoying for the looser? Yes. But, part of the base game mechanic.
#4 - Disagree. You want to send a Retal? Send what you got with what you got. You want 15% more? Go get it.
Profitable? Sure. But, do they sell Mead Attackers? If they do, then I support this idea. If they do not, then I oppose.....
Sleep well.
I'll most likely kill you in the morning.
But an argument can be made that if you gain honor by winning an attack, you should lose honor for losing an attack. Regardless of the amount of times you have to hit someone to "clear" them. You know going into it that you are risking your honor.
I ask you, why are you hitting someone 15 times? If you are in a war with them, then you should be willing to give up your honor level in support of the War Effort. If you are Honor Hunting, that should be the risk you take.
It is my understanding, that the other part of the mechanic they changed was that the Successful Defender used to gain the Honor that the losing attacker lost. This was seen to be too easily manipulated. A few accounts could be used to "feed" another one by building up their Honor Level and then sending 32 soldiers to purposely lose, transferring the Honor.
So, you really cannot have it one way without the other. Otherwise, Honor on the map would eventually dry up.
At the end of the day, Honor is another game currency. A limited amount of it exists and is swapped from one account to another. So, if it is lost by one account, it has to be gained by another. THIS is why what was changed cannot be changed back.
Even if a good argument can be made that the current way seems "unfair"...........
Sleep well.
I'll most likely kill you in the morning.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Art by Sam Hurt, Title Cactus Cat