We need new Moderators!
We are always on the lookout for talented people to join the team. That means you! If you think you could help us organise and inform the community while entertaining everyone then apply. We need people to help out on the forum, behind the scenes with announcements, on Discord and on our other Social Media channels.
If this is something you think might be of interest to you, HERE
Getting rid of unwanted bullies
One would say the bird accomplishes this, but that is in fact wrong as one cannot participate in most events if under the bird. Also, one who selects this non-attack of their castle switch, should be prevented from attacking other alliances (but not participating in Blood Crows or Foreign Castles or Samurai, etc) or becoming a bully themselves. It should be allowed if an alliance has a mix to be able to defend another's castle (which cannot be done under the bird either!) who is ok with bully attacks that is being attacked. This would prevent folks from looting if they are preventing others from looting them.
On the same token, if you want alliances that enjoy attacking each other, there should be an adverse selection to allow them to participate in that activity as much as they desire. I see lots of alliances that state that they are either an event alliance or a bully alliance, so instead of just stating that in the alliance overview, it should be a setting to prevent having to participate in ways that are not desired. You already have the programming in place, this would be an easy fix. The game is not fun until this is accomplished, there is no desire for a LOT of players to continue, to buy rubies or play/support this game for another second until this is accomplished. If there is no desire, continue to expect folks to drop like flies and flee to other games. spend money on other games and waste time sending us emails trying to beg us to come back that will be ignored and spam deleted.