We need new Moderators!
We are always on the lookout for talented people to join the team. That means you! If you think you could help us organise and inform the community while entertaining everyone then apply. We need people to help out on the forum, behind the scenes with announcements, on Discord and on our other Social Media channels.
If this is something you think might be of interest to you, HERE
May Update: Discussion Thread
Sign In to comment.
Comments
And ruby buying is a non-factor as I know a few dozen complete non ruby players (a few of them spent 5$ for WoF pro mode but that is all) and they are very active and get as much shit and good stuff as I do, wether server Size plays a role I cannot say anything about as I do not know enough to give a definite awnser on that but some servers Like asia1 that are matched against other small servers more often get more bad castles in general obviously.
You need or want help to become a better player shoot me a message in the forums or here I'll gladly help you out for free
In hibernation nov2019-now
And the lvl 60-69 rewards same as lvl 70 rewards (the new commander's parts too), but at lvl 60-69 need less glory point.
This is a very bad joke, the GGE killed the PvP battles with the new commanders.
Szabályzat Játék Androidon/IOS-en
The point was that the US server was "fighting" Germany, which on average has larger "castles" than US, whereas Brazil generally has smaller ones. This is why I stated that the glory totals for the past round would be higher than the average.
I did not imply anything about how well Brazil does as a server in the event competitions, but rather that when the foreign invasion matches US against BR, players on average score fewer glory points than if US was matched against Germany.
An easy solution to this, and what Phil was saying about the disparity in servers, is to just match up all servers against a common, random pool of castles chosen from every server. Make sure that every server is matched against the same pool, rather than some servers be matched against US while others fight Romania. Thus a disparity can be avoided. Of course, have the relative "difficulty" of the matched pool vary from event to event, to keep the event from getting REALLY MONOTONE LIKE IT CURRENTLY IS
UPDATE THE CASTLES GEEEEEEEZZZZZZZ
Now when the event started this may have been true, so if you get put up against USA or Germany then you would expect to be hitting larger castles. However the event has been dummed down so many times since then the average castle size shrunk to minute sizes.
The problem is the big servers with the better average castle size tend to be paired with the big servers. Meaning the smaller servers tend to get paired with the smaller servers. Ie they tend to get the crap sized castles.
When there is a global competition on like there currently is, then ALL servers should get the same server to fight ie the same castle profile. Lets be honest no one actually believes this event has anything to do with real servers anymore.
And all events should really have the same castle profile, why should it be any different just becasue you are on a small server? you all have to hit the same 10m target. why make it harder for smaller servers?
At the very least GGE should give all servers the chance to hit Germany every event. At least that way we all have the maximum castle sizes possible. Yes there will be still way too many 500 castles for reality but its better then it is currently.
( buy buy buy buy buy buy buy or stop playing . That's the only thing they get out of it. The server I'm on is soon dead)
If all the castles were incredibly tough and reflected those castles of all the top players in all the top alliances then the attrition rate on troops for average or developing players would be too high to allow the event for most players to last more than an evening. That's why I guess the big castles are spaced out and unlocked by a certain number of hits. There are awful lot of inactive castles and have been for a time I have maybe eight surrounding me in green non of which have many troops so the really weak castles are representative in that regard. Maybe more player led pressure to close inactive accounts might help improve the quality if castles really are updated each time the event runs which to me seems pretty unlikely.
Maybe what players actually want is a shorter FI /. BC with tougher castles and reduced glory targets for rewards. Interested to know whether data supports my belief that player activity in FI and BC nosedives on day 3. If that's the case better surely to have an intense two days. Maybe Short two day blocks but more frequently to allow for players who can't be active on the two days to catch up? Not sure it needs to rebalanced and developed but how is a tricky one.
GGS doesn't want glory to be made in such easy ways, once they said, glory points / gallentry points is a important tool for the game, and "if" we have many events that give acces to this tool, well we have imbalance in the game.I'm talking about the berimond events. That was their reason in the first plan i think, back when the gallentry decay was high. (An easy explanation these tools can be exploited// glory//galentry points)
Same for glory, but i think with the number of defenders in the fl/bc.
So, a easy fix, less defenders, the ballance for the glory is fine.
Even if there are players in big servers with 30+ m in the titles.
Like now with the berimond events, players extended their titles for days, my titles still will be up for 1 week or more, because of how easy is to maintain the gallentry poins) so this is why they don't like to give such easy ways to these "tools"
That's what i'd do, because there is no hope for the new players that already reached level 70 to gain new 5 piece commanders, not now, not in the near feature.
Other option, wait until you will get a good 9 piece commander from the long events. There were some npc commanders and in the last month i think it was a pvp commander. (If i'm not mistaken).
Or, buy some equipments from other events, win them and so on.
Make some combinations, if you have enough piece equipments.
You can have some decent commanders with -% wall/gate/speed .
Here is my king of shadows now.. that it can be done even better:
And here is one of my best commanders since my level 30, my first time in Beri..
It is made with two old Beri equip and two orange pieces..
Not even tech to maX.. lol
Right!...
I do not show gems.. What i do with them is my business..
Even this idiot that came with Zero Gate, i made this:
Right, it still needs to go to that guy with big nose!..
Whatever.. but not that bad without upgrades, for not that stronger targets..
So if i made it, you can make it also!..
Loot as much as you can!... And, do not be afraid to mix pieces of equip, gems whatever.. Sometimes better results than a freshly new commander that you just have to spend millions of coins upgrading it..
@MarchOfTheDamn
Although i do get a lot of glory and can compete but i never can win because i do have crap troops never buy booster for fori , and we hardly ever do glory booster from alliance , so i can taste victory but it is ellusive to me .
I am a full non ruby.. since start..
What do ya think of this:
I just do not have ruby gems..
You have to be wise..
And, i just do not show my gems for idiots of GGS, remember to come with another crazy cap idea on the way we use the gems, we fairly win and conquer with our work..
The gems used in king of shadows are out there at your reach also.. perhaps if you do not only think in the whole of something, but in just in some parts.. but, i clearly see you can never be able to reach that level of thinking.. sometimes the "parts of something" with another "parts of something" are way far better than the "whole of something" together..
You have just have to use your head..
So, i came with advice and you start kicking..
So you no good for this game..
Better Quit, like someone said above!..
if you want everything on a plate without work.. you not going far..
@MarchOfTheDamn
You need or want help to become a better player shoot me a message in the forums or here I'll gladly help you out for free
In hibernation nov2019-now
I can say we have a set of gems that we can acquire more easily than the other.. maybe i just put the weakest in some NPC commanders and the more advanced in other kind commanders..
So not bad at all applying this kind of gems to the King of Shadows.. It just makes him like the "Everwinter Imp", the "fortunes of Desert Sands" and the "summoning".. and not another useless commander..
And a way better than the "Nutcracker" and far way more better than the "Garb of Emerald"..
Speaking in Beri and nomad and sams targets..
As much commanders you have of this better when this events are on.. it saves you time and effort.. ideal for the life of a non ruby..
For towers "Nutcracker" is better only because of - 50 cooldown..
Everyone must build is own way, and find out what is better for their own gameplay..
@MarchOfTheDamn
Ok i will not even comment on that.
So, i came with advice and you start kicking..
You showed me one of your custom made commanders, didnt say how you made him and expect me to understand what ? I too try to think combinations using gems from different sets on 5 piece commanders and castellans.You know what i miss ? Yeah, the pieces. Now, if you made yourself clear from the beginning and explain the process, i would thank you for your precious help. The way you presented it it seemed like a show off. ''Look what ive done,you should too'' style. And i didnt kick you at all,i stated very politely my honest opinion.Anyway i think the conversation has diverged from its original purpose and i will end it here