We need new Moderators!
We are always on the lookout for talented people to join the team. That means you! If you think you could help us organise and inform the community while entertaining everyone then apply. We need people to help out on the forum, behind the scenes with announcements, on Discord and on our other Social Media channels.
If this is something you think might be of interest to you, HERE
Critisism - Alliance power points.
Erm, no we can't. What we can see is who has the most points, but the point system is just plain silly.
Here are what we know so far and which items reward points:
1500 points - "proper" capital.
1500 points - Metropolis upgraded to level 1
750 points - Metropolis not upgraded.
1500 points - Fire capital.
XXXX points - Sand capital.
1250 points - Ice capital
25 points - Royal Tower.
XXXX denotes unknowns at this time, if anyone has the information, please post here.
As can be seen, the points rewarded are just not an accurate showing of an alliances strength. "Proper" capitals should reward far more points than a fire capital or a metropolis. An Ice capital should provide far less. Although Metropolises are good and could be hard to hold I think 1500 points is far too high.
Please adjust the points system to provide a more accurate picture of an alliances real strength. Also, why not include upgrade levels, smithy level and most importantly, alliance level in this system? Maybe honour, building points and weekly looting too.
The system as it is is fairly pointless and in no way shows strength at all.
There is a level 5, 12 player alliance on EN1 (great alliance by the way) who hold an Ice capital and are shown in this system to be stronger than a level 24, 48 player alliance.
Many strong alliances score no points at all. If you want alliances to try to score kudos points then make the system more realistic.
Basically, every alliance should be included in these power points rankings or there is nothing to strive for or aim for.