Home› English (UK)› Ideas, Suggestions & Feedback

Join the official Goodgame Discord today!


Are you looking for a community of like-minded gamers to discuss your favorite games with? Look no further than the GoodGame Empire Family Discord Server!


Our server is the perfect place to connect with other gamers from around the world. Whether you're looking to chat about strategy, share tips and tricks, or just make new friends, our community has got you covered.


And that's not all - as a member of our Discord server, you'll also have access to exclusive giveaways and other special events. It's the perfect way to stay up to date on all the latest news and updates from GoodGame Studios.


So what are you waiting for? Join the GoodGame Empire Family Discord Server today and start connecting with fellow warriors from all over the world. Just head to https://discord.gg/goodgamestudios to join the fun!

Overthrowing the leader

Matt15 (INT2)Matt15 (INT2) INT2 Posts: 96
edited 12.09.2013 in Ideas, Suggestions & Feedback
For the smaller alliances, people should be able to vote there leader out of the position, if he's bad, or no one likes him and he won't give up the position. In addition, if the leader becomes inactive, it takes forever for someone to be appointed a new leader. Ik the deputy leader just came into play, but i still think that overthrowing the leader would be a good idea.
Post edited by Matt15 (INT2) on

Comments

  • dueltheabdul (INT1)dueltheabdul (INT1) Posts: 1,715
    edited 10.09.2013
    This has been suggested so many times before. Please do a search before posting.
    Thank you
  • Dark Chicken (US1)Dark Chicken (US1) Posts: 815
    edited 10.09.2013
    i agree to a point, but this would make a lot of alliances very unstable, what if a bunch of new members came in and overthrew the leader that everyone liked?
  • therealsporer (US1)therealsporer (US1) Posts: 2,266
    edited 10.09.2013
    nothing good about this idea.when you spend rubies to start an alliance you become leader. leader is the only player who can't be kicked. hence leaders can invest rubies without fear of loss. maybe if the idea was that alliances track ruby donations forever and players got to vote the number of rubies they had contributed.... but still no. it fixes nothing and breaks many things.
    if you want a different leader and leader doesn't want to quit, find an alliance that has a different leader.
  • Avc02Avc02 Posts: 9
    edited 10.09.2013
    I don't know I mean I don't know what you are talking about will you explain.
  • Avc02Avc02 Posts: 9
    edited 10.09.2013
    plus what if you get kicked out
  • UrbaneCrib0UrbaneCrib0 Posts: 494
    edited 10.09.2013
    therealsporer wrote: »
    nothing good about this idea.when you spend rubies to start an alliance you become leader. leader is the only player who can't be kicked. hence leaders can invest rubies without fear of loss. maybe if the idea was that alliances track ruby donations forever and players got to vote the number of rubies they had contributed.... but still no. it fixes nothing and breaks many things.
    if you want a different leader and leader doesn't want to quit, find an alliance that has a different leader.

    I agree........
  • cyberhencyberhen Posts: 329
    edited 10.09.2013
    therealsporer wrote: »
    nothing good about this idea.when you spend rubies to start an alliance you become leader. leader is the only player who can't be kicked. hence leaders can invest rubies without fear of loss. maybe if the idea was that alliances track ruby donations forever and players got to vote the number of rubies they had contributed.... but still no. it fixes nothing and breaks many things.
    if you want a different leader and leader doesn't want to quit, find an alliance that has a different leader.

    Or start your own alliance.
  • Molson Beer (US1)Molson Beer (US1) US1 Posts: 8,443
    edited 10.09.2013
    Matt15 wrote: »
    For the smaller alliances, people should be able to vote there leader out of the position, if he's bad, or no one likes him and he won't give up the position. In addition, if the leader becomes inactive, it takes forever for someone to be appointed a new leader. Ik the deputy leader just came into play, but i still think that overthrowing the leader would be a good idea.

    Think about it. The leader is usually the one who founded it. Like it or not,it would be unfair to boot the one who made the alliance with his own rubies and resuurces.
  • blabbyblabby Posts: 564
    edited 10.09.2013
    If you have a bad leader, why did you join in the first place?
  • matt112392matt112392 Posts: 25
    edited 11.09.2013
    If it is a small alliance like 2-5 members why not just leave its not worth overthrowing something as small. My advice if mad just leave.
  • JackelKight (US1)JackelKight (US1) Posts: 533
    edited 12.09.2013
    I agree I am a leader and putty fair to my alliance, if they don't like a rule they can vote it down, but we just expanded to double our size and got flooded with a bunch a new players, I would not like to be voted down by someone that want to be leader of an alliance that they know nothing about its history with others around it.
    (which cause half the rules in the first place)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Comment As ...