greenstar737 wrote: »
guys i agree with bob and dusan both of them have great ideas! Lets not turn this into a war.
BobFighter834 wrote: »
40? I don't know how low a level you are but people have literally thousands of veterans in each of their 7 castles. I'm not sure how large the armies were in medieval times but a million seems quite excessive. Maybe 50 thousand but we can get that in the game, with some ruby stuff.
New units don't really factor in. You were talking about size of armies which comes down to food. And don't we have enough? - prince, swordsman, archer, spearman, bowman, crossbowman, maceman, heavy crossbowman, longbowman, halberdier, two-handed swordsman, veteran maceman, veteran spearman, veteran crossbowman, veteran bowman, travelling knight, travelling crossbowman, pyromaniac, marauder, all 4 kingsguard etc.
BobFighter834 wrote: »
Pathetically said. I can't even begin to describe how stupid the list of bad things is. Actually, I think I will:
*PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL OF THESE NUMBERS REFER TO THE LIST OF BAD THINGS*
1 - If you are going to complain, get it right. It's melee and ranged. There are NOT 2 types of troops in this game. There are about 30. Swordsmen, archers, macemen, crossbowmen, bowmen, spearmen etc. And, if you want to go by "types of types of troops", then there are at least 4: melee attack, melee defence, ranged attack, ranged defence.
2 - What is wrong with tools and units? You use units as the base and add tools for the bonuses. Lots of games use similar things. You never said what was wrong with it - you just said it was wrong.
3 - Ruby players pay for this game. Oh, wait a second... "ruby player" means nothing. It could be a person who bought 2500 rubies; it could be a person who has bought 2500 million rubies. STOP STEREOTYPING PEOPLE WHO HAVE BOUGHT RUBIES. But, anyway, people buying rubies pays for this game. Shut up - the advantage is perfectly fine (and I have NEVER bought a single ruby). 1 person who has bought rubies can only defeat 60 players who haven't bought rubies if the 60 players are a much lower level or have very little intelligence. I don't understand the last bit - you might want to try and speak ENGLISH.
4 - As you said yourself, this is a war game. Attacking players does not make you a bully. Don't get upset just because you have to repair fires. If it takes you weeks, then you are fairly inactive - I will have repaired 32 fires (most of which took at least 2 hours to put out) by the end of this day - the 4th day since the attack where 1000 troops beat me.
5 - The goal in this game is to get to level 60, max out all 7 of your castles, get 90 villages, complete all the quests, help your alliance members and defeat players and NPCs. I don't understand what the problem is.
6 - Every single filter that has ever existed is flawed because it occasionally picks up bits of words as bad language, and can be gotten around easily. I can copy and paste from and to messages and the alliance chat. You might want to make sure that you are pressing "Ctrl + C" or "Ctrl + V" because computers are not psychic.
7 - GGS creativity is terrible. I agree with you on that.
8 - Have you seen how much there is on this forum? I got back after a week's holiday and I am still not even close to reading all the posts that people have made while I was away. Just a few CMs cannot possibly be expected to do so much when they already have a full-time job. Even I am struggling and I have no life.
9 - They are fixing the bug. You complaining does not speed anything up.
10 - There is NOT a bug with every update (note how it's "update" not "upgrade"). Just some of the big ones, and again, your complaining does not solve anything.
11 - THE RBC ATTACK IS BASED ON YOUR LEVEL. WHY CAN'T YOU GET THAT INTO YOUR THICK SKULL?
12 - The Icy Siege and the Thorn King were both optional. You don't have to do them. I missed the Icy Siege. Sodid many other players. Instead of repeating the event, they made something new. So STOP COMPLAINING.
13 - The events do not waste money. The shady character got me 300 rubies and 15,000 coins one time. These events are all optional.
14 - I don't know what you are talking about with the quests. You don't have to listen to the storyline and the quests draws attention to new buildings so newbies can advance.
15 - All games of this type are like this. If you do not like this type of MMORPG, quit it. There was no need for you to say the words "building" and "upgrading" so much.
16 - There is no lag for me. It's probably either your browser, your computer or flash so IT'S NOT GGS' FAULT.
17 - Glory and honour should be enough, but if you don't like that then how about loot (the main source of resources for some players)?
18 - So what? What do you want to put fires out with? Because GGS are not going to create water as a new resource.
19 - There are 4 titles (leader, general, seargent, member). This is better than 2. Why do we need more titles?
20 - They said they are working on new things for alliances. Capital cities are something an alliance should do together. They do not have to copy everything another game does - you mentioned something about no creativity being a problem, and now you want them to steal all their ideas from someone else. Make up your mind.
21 - People are complaining about group alliances (I think someone called them wing-to-wing alliances). How do we solve that problem? According to you, make the number of members unlimited and make it free. What a dumb idea.
22 - There is no alliance logo. Deal with it. It's just another thing that's only purpose is to be aesthetically pleasing, and we don't need it.
23 - Hideouts are useful for low level players. They protect resources from being hidden. You do not have to build any - there isn't even a single quest for them, so there is nothing to complain about.
24 - That's the leader's fault. What do you want GGS to do? They cannot control the minds of their players. They could make an alliance into a complete dictatorship but I don't think anyone would want that.
25 - The other soldiers do not become useless. They become less powerful. Why did you not make this complaint with 2HS and HCB replacing mace and xbow? In every game, things are replaced later with better things. Items of clothing, spell cards etc. You were complaining about this game not using an idea from another game. Now they have, and it's a much more important idea which is much more widely used, and you COMPLAIN about it? That's just rubbish.
26 - Swordsmen are the worst unit in the game. There has to be a worst unit in the game, otherwise there would be no units in the game at all. You do not need to recruit swordsmen, so don't. No-one is forcing you to.
27 - The point of sword brothers is to get you spies and commanders. They have nothing to do with "friends", so I do not understand what on Earth your last comment could mean.
If you are going to complain, get your facts right. Try and use different vocabulary - you used the word "stupid" 3 times in one sentence and 9 times in the whole post. If you can't do that, at least learn English. "Men" is NOT close to "melee", "weak" means "not strong" and does not measure time, "ca" sounds like a sound coming from a crow and your punctuation is horrendous. And why did you need bold or italics or underlining during any part of that post?
Try and learn the meaning of the word OPTIONAL. You don't have to do most of the things that you mentioned. Tents, monthly events and even recruiting certain troops are all OPTIONAL.
BobFighter834 wrote: »
I'm replying to Dusan's reply to my original reply to his original post, if that makes sense.
You don't try to learn English - I pointed out the correct spelling of "melee", and you failed to use it again. What is your first language, anyway?
You use bold, italics and underline for emphasis, but the points you used those features on seemed completely random.
America99 wrote: »
I think there should be a way that you can change the outcome of a battle. Example- You can buy units and have equipment, and all that, but you can not change the outcome of a battle all you do is send 1,000 men and call it a day. I think you should be able to fight in the battles, or control the units from above and command them. This idea, would bring so many people into the game and make it a lot MORE fun. But GGS Does not listen to good ideas and suggestions, it just irritates me. I think GGS Needs to start listing to good ideas from the people that play this game.
And I wish you could make your own troops, like customized troops and them add them into the barracks to use them in battle. You can gather equipment from RBC And use that equipment to make the best troops. NO RUBIES INCLUDED!!!!!
evets4 wrote: »
If you could control every battle, it would mean both sides have to be online and controlling troops, otherwise it wouldn't be fair. I would be impossible to do this for some people who have 5 or more attacks out, or are getting mass attacked. Also the equipment system is actually very complex, you cause it to win battles(for example, with a really good commander 900 men can beat 2,032).
Making your own troops doesn't seem like it's needed in my opinion, they would just be different versions of the default soldiers.
America99 wrote: »
If you are not online in the computer would automatically control your troops. And if you are getting massed attacked, then you could only pick one battle.
evets4 wrote: »
That's not fair for the defense then because all the attackers can control their troops but the defense can't.
And how would the computer control your men?
Higurd wrote: »
pfft ... >P. Chill out a little. Don't take forum 2 seriously >P xD
Besides, don't try to argue with idiots. you will never win since they just drag you to their level xD
i agree with Bobfighter834 though. Dusan is just whining about the fact he doesnt know how 2 play >P for
example "4) too much big punishment if you lose in war " how can there be 2 big punishment for losing war ? you should be gratefull for not going in ruins when you lose >P