The new, 5th Kingdom

Erik the Red2 · 05.10.2012

OK, a modification of those ideas, but without night and day, as real slim shady pointed out, it would be silly for night time in one kingdom but not the rest. And sea monsters would be the siege tools for the pirates, but the player would only have ships and no monsters. And what would moat equivalents be? Ring of Rock? Giant mound that stops boats from coming in?

Zan Wrai (GB1) · 05.10.2012

Here's an idea.It wouldbe designed for an alliance. Each player has ONE fortress. No outposts, no resource villages, just your fortress. Your fortress is tough, but it has three maximum occupancy rate points. For example, you could choose which of your plants has 100 percent. So if I chose maximum occupancy for 3 stone quarries, an alliance member would choose maximum for three woodcutters, and another farms, etc. Only players in alliances could go. Of course, it kind of gives all the power to the big alliances, but they have that anyway. Please reply if you like, and please reply if you don't like it.

Baldrick (GB1) · 05.10.2012

Zan Wrai wrote: »

Here's an idea.It wouldbe designed for an alliance. Each player has ONE fortress. No outposts, no resource villages, just your fortress. Your fortress is tough, but it has three maximum occupancy rate points. For example, you could choose which of your plants has 100 percent. So if I chose maximum occupancy for 3 stone quarries, an alliance member would choose maximum for three woodcutters, and another farms, etc. Only players in alliances could go. Of course, it kind of gives all the power to the big alliances, but they have that anyway. Please reply if you like, and please reply if you don't like it.

I think the problem with this idea (although I like it) is ownership. Even with the capitals, one player must have overall ownership. I suppose this is due to the large numbers of players who change alliances regularly. If there was a way to make a building/castle a part of the alliance I think they would have done that with the capitals.

It would be nice, however to have a kingdom only made up of alliance castles (or harbours). I think it would give alliances the chance to really show how good they are.

Zan Wrai (GB1) · 05.10.2012

Baldrick wrote: »

I think the problem with this idea (although I like it) is ownership. Even with the capitals, one player must have overall ownership. I suppose this is due to the large numbers of players who change alliances regularly. If there was a way to make a building/castle a part of the alliance I think they would have done that with the capitals.

It would be nice, however to have a kingdom only made up of alliance castles (or harbours). I think it would give alliances the chance to really show how good they are.

Let me clarify: Each member would have his own castle, or tower, part of a large alliance fortress. so he could have complete ownership of his part. if he left the alliance, his part would be reset to zero. then the would give each other resources, in order to develop their parts. is that clearer?

famous nadin · 05.10.2012

i go with jade

ajay2260 · 05.10.2012

famous nadin wrote: »

i go with jade

and i go with u sweet indian.

LordEssence · 05.10.2012

I would say it should be a tropical island(lions, tigers...) and the rest Jade's idea. But instead of mountain towers you could have different types... maybe banana tower(lvl 50-60) and... other tropical fruits and stuff...

gaurav.shady · 05.10.2012

good topic to talk about ...

with water as a part , we can have a lot more & different additions of troops\buildings\resources\tools\game play

something different to play with (ice \ desert \ fire peaks were all the same with a different background color and enemy with different costumes )

Baldrick (GB1) · 05.10.2012

Zan Wrai wrote: »

Let me clarify: Each member would have his own castle, or tower, part of a large alliance fortress. so he could have complete ownership of his part. if he left the alliance, his part would be reset to zero. then the would give each other resources, in order to develop their parts. is that clearer?

Yes, much clearer. Thanks.

DarknessGhost · 05.10.2012

jades idea is great

LukeWarrior · 05.10.2012

I would really love to see a new kingdom, but different to the current ones. How about we have a sea kingdom? Your castle is biased on a island and there are new buildings as well as some of the old ones. The island has the standard resources wood, stone and food. One of the new buildings would be the harbour, here you can build ships and go explore! Your can find lots of things from exploring such as new research and troops. You can attack people in the usual way but you have to use ships which incur a much higher travel cost/travel time.

king matt III · 05.10.2012

crazy idea here, an alliance world made of completly capitals. stupid i know but i wanted to throw that out there just to do it. so what do you think even though i know what your going to probably say.

King Tobi · 05.10.2012

Baldrick wrote: »

Yes! I really like the idea of a water based kingdom, with islands and docks/ships. I guess the dynamics of the game would be the same, A attacks B etc.

Then why were you not on my thread "should we have boats?" plus Baldrick i think this idea is pretty good I vote NO for RVs (though i have 2) cuz its hard to find the odd burning castle with an RV

Baldrick (GB1) · 05.10.2012

King Tobi wrote: »

Then why were you not on my thread "should we have boats?" plus Baldrick i think this idea is pretty good I vote NO for RVs (though i have 2) cuz its hard to find the odd burning castle with an RV

I think I was, but I think you wanted boats in the great empire, which is mostly solid ground with a few streams here and there. I think I posted that I liked the idea of boats but only in a new kingdom.

GhjHero · 08.10.2012

If there was a water world and ships were used in place of soldiers, would we still need food or should there be a new resource such as oil maybe since ships don't need to eat?

Baldrick (GB1) · 08.10.2012

GhjHero wrote: »

If there was a water world and ships were used in place of soldiers, would we still need food or should there be a new resource such as oil maybe since ships don't need to eat?

Did you really write that?

The ships carry the troops, whop still eat food.

The ships replace the horses, but who knows where their food comes from, that my friend is a mystery.

Oil? This game is set in the middle ages, ships would use sails and wind power to move around, or oars if they were small enough.

GhjHero · 08.10.2012

I only said that in response to Eric the Red who suggested that ships replace soliders. For example one ship could be a ram ship while another could be a Greek Fire ship (I'm not making that up the ancient Greeks really did invent a type of fire that could burn even underwater.)

Baldrick (GB1) · 08.10.2012

GhjHero wrote: »

I only said that in response to Eric the Red who suggested that ships replace soliders. For example one ship could be a ram ship while another could be a Greek Fire ship (I'm not making that up the ancient Greeks really did invent a type of fire that could burn even underwater.)

My sincerest apologies sir. You didn't quote Erik so it was difficult for me to see you were replying to him.

Not sure if this would work as all the kingdoms are connected together at the moment and troops can travel from kingdom to kingdom. I like boats and maybe they could work it that they could have some interaction between them, but in the same way as castles do. Tools (cannons, fire things) and then once you've destroyed the other ships defences you could board that ship and kill the troops with your troops.

BlueScreenDeath · 09.10.2012

Baldrick wrote: »

My sincerest apologies sir. You didn't quote Erik so it was difficult for me to see you were replying to him.

Not sure if this would work as all the kingdoms are connected together at the moment and troops can travel from kingdom to kingdom. I like boats and maybe they could work it that they could have some interaction between them, but in the same way as castles do. Tools (cannons, fire things) and then once you've destroyed the other ships defences you could board that ship and kill the troops with your troops.

It seems like we are having our 5th Kingdom! As soon as you login you see the latest news which says there is gonna be a 5th Kingdom! I am eager to see whether our idea's are going to be put into practice! Lets cross our fingers!

destructo · 09.10.2012

BlueScreenDeath wrote: »

It seems like we are having our 5th Kingdom! As soon as you login you see the latest news which says there is gonna be a 5th Kingdom! I am eager to see whether our idea's are going to be put into practice! Lets cross our fingers!

It seems we will have to chose the:Blue or the Red sdie on the 5th kingdom,don't know how that will work but ok....

The new, 5th Kingdom

Comments

Leave a Comment