Home› English (UK)› Off Topic

Join the official Goodgame Discord today!


Are you looking for a community of like-minded gamers to discuss your favorite games with? Look no further than the GoodGame Empire Family Discord Server!


Our server is the perfect place to connect with other gamers from around the world. Whether you're looking to chat about strategy, share tips and tricks, or just make new friends, our community has got you covered.


And that's not all - as a member of our Discord server, you'll also have access to exclusive giveaways and other special events. It's the perfect way to stay up to date on all the latest news and updates from GoodGame Studios.


So what are you waiting for? Join the GoodGame Empire Family Discord Server today and start connecting with fellow warriors from all over the world. Just head to https://discord.gg/goodgamestudios to join the fun!

Who is the bravest alliance in En 1?

135

Comments

  • GeminiGemini Posts: 32
    edited 03.10.2012
    Wasn't asking for an explanation.
  • LegendaryKing64LegendaryKing64 Posts: 173
    edited 03.10.2012
    and the person who made this thread got kicked out of his alliance for some reason, and we pretty much tore crimson guard apart and they are probably cryin now or something for messing with us
    A little history lesson for you buddy, we are the only level 15 alliance on the server (you know, gained by glory) and this was obtained by bashing the heads in of every other alliance with far fewer players. They arent in the same league as us and not the other way around.

    So, you are opening gates just so that you don't feed BSK their glory? There are more than 1 way to skin a cat you know. When we were first at war with you guys, you never once opened your gates, and now it is getting to be a regular occurance. I mean, Crimson have challenged you in green, and NOT once have you shown up. Always attacking players at their weakest either in sands or fire peaks. By the way, yet another victory for us mighty Crimson:

    todayzh.jpg

    This has nothing to do with BSK and glory points.
  • LokienLokien Posts: 14
    edited 03.10.2012
    Nobody asked for your opinion about our 'crumbling' alliance either but you don't see me complaining..
  • Baldrick (GB1)Baldrick (GB1) Posts: 4,948
    edited 03.10.2012
    Lokien wrote: »
    1+1 = 2.. We dont want to feed glory to bsk = open gates to bsk + dont attack bsk

    Makes sense yet?

    Khalifa (my relative by the way) is too busy for the game.

    In the past hour one of our members singlehandedly killed ~4.5k of bsks defenders. Im sure they arent licking their lips.. probably walking funny

    Yeah but he lost 7,000 attackers in the process (licks lips). They were yummy. Burp!
  • GeminiGemini Posts: 32
    edited 03.10.2012
    Lokien wrote: »
    Nobody asked for your opinion about our 'crumbling' alliance either but you don't see me complaining..

    Because I don't think my alliance is 'top boss'.
  • LegendaryKing64LegendaryKing64 Posts: 173
    edited 03.10.2012
    Baldrick wrote: »
    I was there man.
    Baldrick wrote: »
    Yeah but he lost 7,000 attackers in the process (licks lips). They were yummy. Burp!

    You seem to be in the know balders...lol
  • LokienLokien Posts: 14
    edited 03.10.2012
    LegendaryKing64 wrote: »
    So, you are opening gates just so that you don't feed BSK their glory? There are more than 1 way to skin a cat you know. When we were first at war with you guys, you never once opened your gates, and now it is getting to be a regular occurance. I mean, Crimson have challenged you in green, and NOT once have you shown up. Always attacking players at their weakest either in sands or fire peaks. By the way, yet another victory for us mighty Crimson:


    This has nothing to do with BSK and glory points.

    You remember those 4 attacks you sent on Darwish + outposts not too many days back? You lost them all remember? Do you have any idea who supported? :) Take a wild guess.. "these attacks were to know how many troops darwish had" was your excuse when you lost

    btw congrats on winning that attack.. since you're so happy about it perhaps the next few days will be interesting for you
  • LegendaryKing64LegendaryKing64 Posts: 173
    edited 03.10.2012
    Mind you Lokien, now that the new rules have come into play, once you have lost one of your 15 food rvs, you cannot get them back, which means less and less troops.
  • GeminiGemini Posts: 32
    edited 03.10.2012
    Really? Khalifa is so busy she needs to go to The Wild Bunch?
    Get real.
  • LokienLokien Posts: 14
    edited 03.10.2012
    Baldrick wrote: »
    Yeah but he lost 7,000 attackers in the process (licks lips). They were yummy. Burp!

    Dont worry theres way more where that came from
  • LokienLokien Posts: 14
    edited 03.10.2012
    Gemini wrote: »
    Really? Khalifa is so busy she needs to go to The Wild Bunch?
    Get real.

    You wouldn't understand if I explained, and you aren't asking for an explanation anyways are you?
  • GeminiGemini Posts: 32
    edited 03.10.2012
    Lokien wrote: »
    Dont worry theres way more where that came from

    Don't worry, no need to rush.
  • LegendaryKing64LegendaryKing64 Posts: 173
    edited 03.10.2012
    Lokien wrote: »
    You remember those 4 attacks you sent on Darwish + outposts not too many days back? You lost them all remember? Do you have any idea who supported? :) Take a wild guess.. "these attacks were to know how many troops darwish had" was your excuse when you lost

    btw congrats on winning that attack.. since you're so happy about it perhaps the next few days will be interesting for you

    1. I didn't even send an attack today Lokien so, you have your facts wrong, surely you communicate with your alliance, don't you?

    2. As a level 60 player, you should know that you can send 4 waves of troops, or 1,040 troops in all. Am I right? I had over 1,000 troops so, answer me this, why on earth did I send 260 troops to his main, 250+ to his two outposts and 250 each roughly to another illuminati player? Why do that when I could send easily the 1,040 in one go? Surely it is a waste of siege tools, don't you think? It was for intel my friend, intel, to try and find out how many troops he had and to get a little glory in the process. Words "sharpest", and "tool", spring to my mind.
  • LokienLokien Posts: 14
    edited 03.10.2012
    LegendaryKing64 wrote: »
    1. I didn't even send an attack today Lokien so, you have your facts wrong, surely you communicate with your alliance, don't you?

    2. As a level 60 player, you should know that you can send 4 waves of troops, or 1,040 troops in all. Am I right? I had over 1,000 troops so, answer me this, why on earth did I send 260 troops to his main, 250+ to his two outposts and 250 each roughly to another illuminati player? Why do that when I could send easily the 1,040 in one go? Surely it is a waste of siege tools, don't you think? It was for intel my friend, intel, to try and find out how many troops he had and to get a little glory in the process. Words "sharpest", and "tool", spring to my mind.

    You saw how many troops I and several others had you tool. and your alliance leader was the one who attacked.. why should I be telling you this?
  • LegendaryKing64LegendaryKing64 Posts: 173
    edited 03.10.2012
    No, I didn't as I went in blind. And please, enough of the keyboard warrior stuff, it gets boring after a while.
  • LokienLokien Posts: 14
    edited 03.10.2012
    *checks who started the thread*

    Hmm......

    Anyways, you are right for a change. Good luck
  • GeminiGemini Posts: 32
    edited 03.10.2012
    Lokien wrote: »
    You wouldn't understand if I explained, and you aren't asking for an explanation anyways are you?

    That wasn't even a question.
  • LegendaryKing64LegendaryKing64 Posts: 173
    edited 03.10.2012
    Anyway, back on-topic, unless there is a complete rush of votes, the current leaders are BSK, with the Holy Grail and illuminati in joint-second with 7 votes each, with UKnighted a very close third.
  • LegendaryKing64LegendaryKing64 Posts: 173
    edited 03.10.2012
    Lokien wrote: »
    *checks who started the thread*

    Hmm......

    Anyways, you are right for a change. Good luck

    Yes, it was me who started the thread. I could have easily voted my own because of our size. I mean we are not the biggest of alliances, but we did our best. In the interest of fair-play, I couldn't vote for my own so, I had to vote for another one, another alliance that merited it. Of all the wars I have been in, and it quite a lot, I have alway left a message whether I had won or lost, congratulating them on their valiance.
  • Baldrick (GB1)Baldrick (GB1) Posts: 4,948
    edited 03.10.2012
    Lokien wrote: »
    Dont worry theres way more where that came from

    We've already pooped out what you sent earlier so that's a good thing :)
This discussion has been closed.