Home English (UK) Ideas, Suggestions & Feedback

Join the official Goodgame Discord today!


Are you looking for a community of like-minded gamers to discuss your favorite games with? Look no further than the GoodGame Empire Family Discord Server!


Our server is the perfect place to connect with other gamers from around the world. Whether you're looking to chat about strategy, share tips and tricks, or just make new friends, our community has got you covered.


And that's not all - as a member of our Discord server, you'll also have access to exclusive giveaways and other special events. It's the perfect way to stay up to date on all the latest news and updates from GoodGame Studios.


So what are you waiting for? Join the GoodGame Empire Family Discord Server today and start connecting with fellow warriors from all over the world. Just head to https://discord.gg/goodgamestudios to join the fun!

Different alliance chats.

Perhaps there could be different chats for different ranked members of an alliance as well as the general chat.For example a chat only for members a chat only for sergeants and a chat only for generals,the leader being able to access all of the chats.

I know there are flaws to the idea so if anyone can think of one please post it here.
Post edited by [Deleted User] on
«1

Comments

  • f87f87 Posts: 139
    edited 25.07.2012
    If you have a group of many people and you want to speek only those with a certain rank. Then it's a great idea to have different chat possibilities. But I don't think you should devide the group of people in more than two chats. And not being able to join another chat because of your rank.

    My idee is. Keep a normal chat (the chat how it's now) and give the leader the possibility to create another chat for the people of his choice from the group. So that it is possible to chat only with people that he/she has to talk to.

    The leader can open/close the chat and can decide at anytime who can join into the chatsession.
    f87 @ nl 1
  • AlcraighAlcraigh Posts: 361
    edited 25.07.2012
    Perhaps there could be different chats for different ranked members of an alliance as well as the general chat.For example a chat only for members a chat only for sergeants and a chat only for generals,the leader being able to access all of the chats.

    I know there are flaws to the idea so if anyone can think of one please post it here.

    If you want that, perhaps go to an outside goodgamestudios.com website and use another chat site. Also, why do you want to not include all members of your alliance? Starts to alienate players, break down authority and create disharmony. No one wants to be ostracised.

    As for functionality, another tab! There's enough already on screen.
    "Due to the rain, the revolution has been postponed."
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited 25.07.2012
    Alcraigh will you put down the dictionary,see the possibility that other people make friends in real life not in gaming as such we would not be able to find each other on another chat website.f87 I like that idea perhaps it could work like that.
  • Luke FieryswordLuke Fierysword Posts: 2,290
    edited 25.07.2012
    I like this idea....We could keep the normal chat and have special chats as well (but perhaps not separated by ranks) this would make a conversation between a leader and his generals much more easier
    Roman Empire

    Ambition Courage Loyalty
  • DarkMonicaDarkMonica Posts: 195
    edited 25.07.2012
    there are tons of chat sites that are free and have great colors and you can have all the ones that you want to have access to it have the password--i see no need to include this as part of the updates. It would alienate people and create resentments within the alliance. I think in the end it would hurt communications rather than enhance it.
    DarkMonica @ usa 1
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited 25.07.2012
    Darkmonica,like luke said it would make talks between leader and generals much easier and would help combat live espionage (sending a member into another alliance to get information,it sounds ridiculous but I have used it and it is very effective) and is very useful if you're alliance is in a family especially if it is the leading alliance.
  • DarkMonicaDarkMonica Posts: 195
    edited 25.07.2012
    Yes chatzy and msn both have free chat sites that are designed for that purpose. You can even have an inter alliance chat set up for just the leaders--there is no need to include this as part of the updates for the game--just set up your own account.
    DarkMonica @ usa 1
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited 26.07.2012
    Maybe just another chat for leader and generals then,just easier than making an account on something else.
  • Serious BlackSerious Black Posts: 752
    edited 26.07.2012
    I agree with Luke Fierysword
    seriousblack-1.png
    I thank DeltaPhoenix for my siggy.
  • AlcraighAlcraigh Posts: 361
    edited 26.07.2012
    Alcraigh will you put down the dictionary,see the possibility that other people make friends in real life not in gaming as such we would not be able to find each other on another chat website.f87 I like that idea perhaps it could work like that.

    If you don't understand the words I'm using perhaps you should spend more time reading and learning than being on here. Again, you are very emotional - getting upset because I don't rate your idea. It'll clutter the screen unnecessarily. You already have a chat tab. Why another one is needed for in game chat.......
    "Due to the rain, the revolution has been postponed."
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited 26.07.2012
    Alcraigh wrote: »
    If you don't understand the words I'm using perhaps you should spend more time reading and learning than being on here. Again, you are very emotional - getting upset because I don't rate your idea. It'll clutter the screen unnecessarily. You already have a chat tab. Why another one is needed for in game chat.......

    Alcraigh I understand the words you use,I just think they are unnecessary and I probably spend more time reading than you,I'm not at all upset for the simple reasons that 1. I accepted when I started this thread that there were flaws in the idea and
    2.I rate your opinion at just below nothing.
  • AlcraighAlcraigh Posts: 361
    edited 26.07.2012
    Alcraigh I understand the words you use,I just think they are unnecessary and I probably spend more time reading than you,I'm not at all upset for the simple reasons that 1. I accepted when I started this thread that there were flaws in the idea and
    2.I rate your opinion at just below nothing.

    Oh, another swiftarrow post that makes me chuckle. You have to stop getting upset when someone disagrees with you. You want another chat option, I don't. Why do you get hung up on it. Sheesh.
    "Due to the rain, the revolution has been postponed."
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited 26.07.2012
    Alcraigh wrote: »
    Oh, another swiftarrow post that makes me chuckle. You have to stop getting upset when someone disagrees with you. You want another chat option, I don't. Why do you get hung up on it. Sheesh.

    I could say the same thing to you alcraigh I have just told you I don't care that you disagree with me,I'm not the kind of person who sees something in a forum and starts crying over the keyboard.And another completely random but nonetheless true thing "Why thank-you that's the nicest thing you've ever said to me".

    P.S The last part was a joke (though it's still true) so don't write another ten paragraphs on why that's not true.
  • jake lathropjake lathrop Posts: 12
    edited 31.07.2012
    it would be helpful if the leader just needed to discuss a few things with his general like what should we upgrade or something else everybody else does not need to see
    jake lathrop @ usa 1
  • edited 01.08.2012
    another chat box? IMO, too complicated, unnecessary, and just not worth the time, money, and effort.

    if you wanna talk some things over with your general, while at the same time you're not bothered to create an account on a different website, just use the pm function.

    you may argue its inconvenient, but you shouldn't need to communicate a lot with ONLY with your general, except during certain situations. just include the rest of the alliance in normal discussions, using the alliance chat or mass mails.
    ProStrategos @ EN 1

    'Heroes fight to the death, but so do fools and lunatics.'

    'All my villagers said they're fed up of food. They want beer or rubies. I'm all outta beer.' - MaJeStiic

    Proud General of United and a Leader of the Guild of Unity!
    United We Stand!
  • AlcraighAlcraigh Posts: 361
    edited 01.08.2012
    2.I rate your opinion at just below nothing.

    I find it ironic that on this post you say my opinion doesn't matter to you, but here in this thread http://en.board.goodgamestudios.com/empire/showthread.php?26559-Mass-attacks/page3
    You say that you want my opinion???
    Alcraigh you have not said WHY you do not like the new version!

    I'm confused. Do you want my opinion or do you not want my opinion? Do you want anyone's opinion that differs to yours is perhaps the appropriate question???
    another chat box? IMO, too complicated, unnecessary, and just not worth the time, money, and effort.

    if you wanna talk some things over with your general, while at the same time you're not bothered to create an account on a different website, just use the pm function.

    you may argue its inconvenient, but you shouldn't need to communicate a lot with ONLY with your general, except during certain situations. just include the rest of the alliance in normal discussions, using the alliance chat or mass mails.

    As for supporting arguments. Please see above swiftarrow21.
    "Due to the rain, the revolution has been postponed."
  • bobbysbrobobbysbro Posts: 1,265
    edited 01.08.2012
    u could have diffrent chat tabs in ur alliance a normal 1 and say a war 1 were u jusr descuse war plans
    Level 70
    Bobbysbro @ world 1

    #SAVE INTER1

    #KILLBUGSSTOPUPDATES

    #TheDreamLivesOn
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited 01.08.2012
    Alcraigh wrote: »
    I find it ironic that on this post you say my opinion doesn't matter to you, but here in this thread http://en.board.goodgamestudios.com/empire/showthread.php?26559-Mass-attacks/page3
    You say that you want my opinion?


    I'm confused. Do you want my opinion or do you not want my opinion? Do you want anyone's opinion that differs to yours is perhaps the appropriate question???



    As for supporting arguments. Please see above swiftarrow21.

    I am happy to hear most peoples opinion but your is just getting tedious and predictable,you disagree with every idea except your own,I don't care about your opinion but I do care about you posting on my thread without saying WHY as your own quote shows.Prostrategos,you have overlooked the fact that many alliances have more than one general and just about every alliance leader has better things to do than send the same message over and over again especially when it's a long one.
  • AlcraighAlcraigh Posts: 361
    edited 02.08.2012
    I am happy to hear most peoples opinion but your is just getting tedious and predictable,you disagree with every idea except your own,I don't care about your opinion but I do care about you posting on my thread without saying WHY as your own quote shows.Prostrategos,you have overlooked the fact that many alliances have more than one general and just about every alliance leader has better things to do than send the same message over and over again especially when it's a long one.

    You obviously are one of those users that just reads the last 2 comments on a thread and doesn't see the previous comments made that often contain the arguments in support or against an idea. If you had read through the posts I have made on your idea (this one and the other one I didn't like in the link above), you will have seen a number of reasons that I put forward as to why I didn't like your idea. If you can't find them poignant comments I certainly am not going to keep re-iterating them in every follow up post for you.

    As for the comment about me disagreeing with everything, you will notice I have made almost 500 posts and none of them are in the "Entertainment and Spam" section but the General Qu's, Bugs and Suggestions... sections. Hence, many of those are actually in support of, offering help and advice to and discussing in game issues. Perhaps it's just that most of my disagreeable comments are occurring on your threads as your suggestions don't resonate with me.
    "Due to the rain, the revolution has been postponed."
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited 02.08.2012
    Alcraigh wrote: »
    You obviously are one of those users that just reads the last 2 comments on a thread and doesn't see the previous comments made that often contain the arguments in support or against an idea. If you had read through the posts I have made on your idea (this one and the other one I didn't like in the link above), you will have seen a number of reasons that I put forward as to why I didn't like your idea. If you can't find them poignant comments I certainly am not going to keep re-iterating them in every follow up post for you.

    As for the comment about me disagreeing with everything, you will notice I have made almost 500 posts and none of them are in the "Entertainment and Spam" section but the General Qu's, Bugs and Suggestions... sections. Hence, many of those are actually in support of, offering help and advice to and discussing in game issues. Perhaps it's just that most of my disagreeable comments are occurring on your threads as your suggestions don't resonate with me.

    The final version of the idea took care of all the problems that you already mentioned,so you're earlier reasons did not apply which you apparently ignored.Now back on topic before a mod closes this thread...

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file