An RV for everybody!

Dark Chicken (US1)

barun2 wrote: »

Oddly, I applaud Twaitsy's effort in this. As he sees it, there is an injustice and hes trying to stand up to it and effect change. Just because those notions seem absurd to most of us doesn't mean the guy shouldn't get some respect for trying.

The concept has some merit, rvs within 10 clicks are much easier to defend and or attack by the players close to them since there is a chance that you can support yourself and unless the owner commits decent defense you can keep harassing those Rvs with minimal troop numbers and forcing players to expend energy they havnt had to previously in defense.

The reality though is this, Someone comes for my Rvs, I defend, they keep coming or even take one, then I have no choice but to shut them down completely or spend 50% of my time defending and fighting for RVs for no glory or honor. In this situation im personally going for option 1. Rather than have my Rvs under constant threat, im going to keep hitting a castle preventing any troops from massing simply so I can have an easier life on game. Its either that or cede them over to another player. That reaction of not leaving players with a single troop alive till they come to their senses is whats going to cause the havoc and mayhem that will come.

see, i don't, he is leading most alliances (if he actually has support) to their doom, not a good leader in my opinion

Baldrick (GB1)

Dark Chicken wrote: »

see, i don't, he is leading most alliances (if he actually has support) to their doom, not a good leader in my opinion

We all agree that all players having villages would be good for the game, but thinking that stealing them from players who have 20,000 troops each at their disposal is suicide.

We work with the game as designed by GGS. They balanced the villages in a way that there will never be enough to go around.

I have my own views on this which I have voiced many times already. We will never fight over villages as GGS intended, what they need to do is come up with something else. My idea? Increase the base production of vilageless castles and reduce the production boosts that come from villages.

ImmortalFalcon

It's good I am with you Dope Legion Single Alliance cannot be overpowered not in other kingdoms everyone there should be a limit for rvs.Remove the rvs of the players that hold 20 rvs.

Baldrick (GB1)

ImmortalFalcon wrote: »

It's good I am with you Dope Legion Single Alliance cannot be overpowered not in other kingdoms everyone there should be a limit for rvs.Remove the rvs of the players that hold 20 rvs.

Yeah sure, penalise those who have worked the hardest and probably spent the most.

Sure, the balance should be more even, but please try to come up with something better than a cheap shot at something you have no chance of sustaining.

Unknown

You can't criticize the rules of one group of players then establish your own set of rules and hold yourself up as an example of anarchy.

Robin Hood was still a criminal regardless of his intentions or the support he received from the general populace.

Baldrick (GB1)

Jin English wrote: »

You can't criticize the rules of one group of players then establish your own set of rules and hold yourself up as an example of anarchy.

Robin Hood was still a criminal regardless of his intentions or the support he received from the general populace.

Yeah, and Robin Hood wasn't rich,and he didn't keep it all either.

Robbing Hoods more like!

Unknown

what this genius might be trying to do is to get you to stock pile your rvs with defensive troops, thereby lowering the defensive capabilities of your castles, which his alliance will then mass attack.

still a fool's errand, but one that might be worth a chuckle to him.

Baldrick (GB1)

Jin English wrote: »

what this genius might be trying to do is to get you to stock pile your rvs with defensive troops, thereby lowering the defensive capabilities of your castles, which his alliance will then mass attack.

still a fool's errand, but one that might be worth a chuckle to him.

We have max support speed. I can make it anywhere on the map in less than 20 minutes. I have 15,000 King's Guard Defenders.

If that is their plan, it will fail.

I win!

Again!

Haha!

Dark Chicken (US1)

this is the worst plan. ever. how about, twaitsy, you give all of your rv's away first, then you start a revolution

Unknown

Twaitsy wrote: »

We're not relying on luck alone Baldrick, perhaps we have a 'cunning plan'. (sorry, I just couldn't resist)

Not sure if I need will need charcoal but bring some over anyway so we can get a BBQ going. ;-)

You will like my BBQs Baldrick, every one returns to their castles with a doggy bag!

if you were a real man of genius, thanks Mr. obvious forum wannabe war director, you wouldnt need to recruit on the forum. it would be done behind the scenes. thats how the real men of genius handle their business. what, you dont think the top 1%ers fight over each others rvs. i can remember about 4 weeks without war in the last 5 months with major alliances. and i cant remember one week where there wasnt someone on the forum trying to get all the level 40's to rise up to conquer the map. remember einstein, we all started at level one with our own castles and the alliance started with one castle in it. pay your dues you impatient ingrate.

p1234pk5

R.I.P. Dope Legion

Dark Chicken (US1)

p1234pk5 wrote: »

R.I.P. Dope Legion

who is dope legion, they'll be destroyed so badly they'll get wiped from memory

Twaitsy (GB1)

Cowards work behind the scenes, and it's never long before an alliance sells out for protection by one of the biggest. Look how many alliances out there are *friends* with a bigger alliance, you guys try reminding me this is a war game while you all have more friends than enemies, and you dare not enter deep water like we do.

Also, people seem to forget this is a game, it's not real life! The more serious the naysayers get about this the more hysterical it really becomes. People enjoy the game for a variety of reasons other than winning and having the least flames. Think I won't be smiling full burn? Think again. I get to watch you throw your toys out of the pram over and over and over...

I get to set an example, and hopefully I can bring together the players who know my plan will work, the players who know this is just a silly game, the players who have the courage to stand up to you. If I can keep you just a little bit busy and come back here on the 16th, the 17th and onwards in better spirits than you then I will have proved your time is running out.

I'm loving the hostility, insults, sarcasm and unconstructive comments from big alliances and different servers.

Enjoy throwing your toys, don't drop your dummy.

T

Dark Chicken (US1)

Twaitsy wrote: »

Cowards work behind the scenes, and it's never long before an alliance sells out for protection by one of the biggest. Look how many alliances out there are *friends* with a bigger alliance, you guys try reminding me this is a war game while you all have more friends than enemies, and you dare not enter deep water like we do.

Also, people seem to forget this is a game, it's not real life! The more serious the naysayers get about this the more hysterical it really becomes. People enjoy the game for a variety of reasons other than winning and having the least flames. Think I won't be smiling full burn? Think again. I get to watch you throw your toys out of the pram over and over and over...

I get to set an example, and hopefully I can bring together the players who know my plan will work, the players who know this is just a silly game, the players who have the courage to stand up to you. If I can keep you just a little bit busy and come back here on the 16th, the 17th and onwards in better spirits than you then I will have proved your time is running out.

I'm loving the hostility, insults, sarcasm and unconstructive comments from big alliances and different servers.

Enjoy throwing your toys, don't drop your dummy.

T

you still haven't answered my challenge, to not be a hypocrite, you need to go into this battle with no rv's, when you give up all of your rv's i'll support you

Monkeyjax63

You can't blame a guy for adding a bit of spice to his life! ;-)

Baldrick (GB1)

Monkeyjax63 wrote: »

You can't blame a guy for adding a bit of spice to his life! ;-)

Epic Phall!

Unknown

Twaitsy wrote: »

Cowards work behind the scenes, and it's never long before an alliance sells out for protection by one of the biggest. Look how many alliances out there are *friends* with a bigger alliance, you guys try reminding me this is a war game while you all have more friends than enemies, and you dare not enter deep water like we do.

Also, people seem to forget this is a game, it's not real life! The more serious the naysayers get about this the more hysterical it really becomes. People enjoy the game for a variety of reasons other than winning and having the least flames. Think I won't be smiling full burn? Think again. I get to watch you throw your toys out of the pram over and over and over...

I get to set an example, and hopefully I can bring together the players who know my plan will work, the players who know this is just a silly game, the players who have the courage to stand up to you. If I can keep you just a little bit busy and come back here on the 16th, the 17th and onwards in better spirits than you then I will have proved your time is running out.

I'm loving the hostility, insults, sarcasm and unconstructive comments from big alliances and different servers.

Enjoy throwing your toys, don't drop your dummy.

T

you better be online the morning of the 16th talker. the end of the world has been predicted a dozen times and everyone of those dates have come and gone with nothing happening except the nutjobs of the world giving up all their earthly possessions because they were following a false prophet. do you have people following you. it may bring an end to their world if they do.

Monkeyjax63

Baldrick wrote: »

Epic Phall!

Ouch!!! Think I've done a rib brb heading down to A & E

cooldude20

jules Delany wrote: »

You know I had my laptop stolen, lost my ops my Rvs and was nearly burnt out.
Took me 4 weeks to get back online.
My Alliance had dropped me because they didn't now what had really happened apart from one rushed message and
they took all my RVs.
I haven't asked for one RV back. Because the game is not just about RVs, sure they're handy and all but you CAN survive without them most of us do.
Instead of trying to take what isn't yours put your energy into making your alliance great, building up a network of strong allies and work at getting so strong you are one of those alliances to whom RVs come easy.

And just one final thing, if the big 5 alliances don't tell us what to do, make up new rules and try to enforce them on us, WHY ON EARTH SHOULD YOU?

Hey Jules why you gone running off with Cupish outposts?

Unknown

goldfinger2 wrote: »

Hypothetically speaking, it could work. If they spam attack all of the food rvs of the major alliances, eventually there won't be enough food in the castles of the major alliances, so the number of troops they can keep at a castle - their main advantage - will be lessened.

Fyi that doesnt matter I have a strong food supply of 300 from farms and no food rvs and I manage to keep 2k troops there most of the time... and thats along with 2k+ at bs and ew... you dont need massive amounts of rvs to be decent at this game you just need to know how to play!

Message me if you need some pointers and I can save you losing what you do have in a fruitless war