Real Battle simulation

TheKnightofAwe

Would it be a good idea to see little soldiers fighting in your castle during raids and attacks. Like seeing little men use rams and stone throwings to kill each other. This is a VERY good idea but it would be glitchy. What do you think?

Deathsmith

While I feel like it would add another facinating facet to the game, I don't want anything to be added until the big bugs are fixed. I really want to see soldiers get bitten in half by the swamp snappers!

Zub-Zub

This would be really cool, but it would make the game extremely laggy.

Billy962

yea itll b great but gge wont allow it. its 2 "violent", such as ppl using stones 2 KILL each other. not kid-friendly and itll probably make them get sued

TheKnightofAwe

then let it be able to be turned off

TheKnightofAwe

Please be honest it's cool don't think about ratings overall its good

PS GGE can't be sued if they put it on their contract to play the game duh

007Ben (US1)

I said "No, because it's a terrible idea." But I meant "No, because the game isn't set up right for real-time tactical combat." The game moves on during the battle. Oh, and what happens to the wall bonuses? And what if somebody attacks and the other person isn't online? Do the defenders just sit there and get killed without even raising a sword?

That aside, I love real-time combat. I can use tactics to my advantage in spite of inferior quality or numbers. I mean no offence, but the game just isn't set up to handle this type of battle.

EL The Invader

It is just an animation,just a little bit of art but it make Defenders have no chance to watch is except:RBC's Raid

Tiroler1987

Nice i really like it

TheKnightofAwe

007Ben wrote: »

I said "No, because it's a terrible idea." But I meant "No, because the game isn't set up right for real-time tactical combat." The game moves on during the battle. Oh, and what happens to the wall bonuses? And what if somebody attacks and the other person isn't online? Do the defenders just sit there and get killed without even raising a sword?

That aside, I love real-time combat. I can use tactics to my advantage in spite of inferior quality or numbers. I mean no offence, but the game just isn't set up to handle this type of battle.

But if the player isn't online the soldiers will still fight like now when you're not online

jo1

TheKnightofAwe wrote: »

Would it be a good idea to see little soldiers fighting in your castle during raids and attacks. Like seeing little men use rams and stone throwings to kill each other. This is a VERY good idea but it would be glitchy. What do you think?

did you know that i dreamed that there was a raid then it crushed my wall and burned my castle

famous nadin

nooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! we have no more dwelings for bugs nooooooooo!

p.s.edit what if in the animation the attackers troops are killing there own allies with a bug??? lol

123guy

It is people like this who beg for animation who drag this game down.

I like that updates that:

1. Benefit me in some way
2. Are fun
3. Do not cause lag/are not animated

And anyway this idea is already implemented!
Because some people wanted animations they scraped the lovely clean, straight to the point battle report. It caused complaints and serious lag. Imagine this with a 5,000 soldier battle. That wont work.

One big no from me.

Ante55

Well...the game lags a lot with a guy swinging your flag when you win an attack, now what about them battling?

Unknown

but then like 1040 men attacking a fully defenced castle mightn't fit

Molson Beer (US1)

This idea has already been suggested by many people (including me),and I've come to realize how much lag this would cause the game.

If the new battle reports already cause quite a bit of lag,imagine watching an entire battle.It would be like watching a stop-motion movie in slow motion.

TheKnightofAwe

People when you no the game will be to glitchy but still it's good would logic tell you that to Vote "Yes but no it would be to glitchy"

Whippler

It would lag so much just having snoring sings above the barack slows things down it is a very laggy idea

Luke Fierysword

Although this idea has been suggested before, and I would find it quite entertaining, it will not happen because of lag, and of course, GGS's specialty: For every good update, there are at least 3 bugs.



So unfortunately, a no from me...GGS can't be trusted with a project this big sometimes....

wait...sometimes?

keep1

It would merge clash of clans and gge

rulernbrown2

than why not limit the soldiers you can see on the battle fields and ggs and edit the other stuff it need i think its a great idea, it will stop the lag at least and i agree want the bugs fixed than we can try this