Home Ideas, Suggestions & Feedback

We need new Moderators!


ModeratorWe are always on the lookout for talented people to join the team. That means you! If you think you could help us organise and inform the community while entertaining everyone then apply. We need people to help out on the forum, behind the scenes with announcements, on Discord and on our other Social Media channels.


If this is something you think might be of interest to you, HERE

Alliance ranks suggestion

SvetovnaSilaSvetovnaSila Posts: 583
I Suggest we have more ranks in alliance like:
1. Leader
2. Sub-leader (is leader automaticly if main leader is in other alliance for some reason)
3. Diplomat ( doing the alliance diplomacy and can invite other diplomats from other alliances to diplomat chat + he can be whatever rank in ally)
4. General
5. Sergeant First Class ( can promote sergeants and members and oversee how many troops alliance members lost)
6. Sergeant
7. Member
And one more suggestion: every year alliance should vote leader and vice leader!

Please feel free to post critics
Post edited by SvetovnaSila on
8d1fd513943faaf57ffdb000490cfdee.gif
«1

Comments

  • madperson (INT1)madperson (INT1) Posts: 337
    edited 01.11.2012
    I definitively agree that there should be more ranks in an alliance. Maybe:

    - Leader (max 1)
    - Vice-leader (max 1)
    - Diplomat (max 1)
    - Head general (max 1)
    - Attack Generals (max 2)
    - Defence generals (max 2)
    - Normal Generals (unlimited)
    - Head Sergeant (max 1)
    - Sergeant (unlimited)
    - Member (unlimited)

    That is how I would picture a good alliance. If the leader wants, he doesn't have to use all the specific ranks but in strong alliances like mine, it would definitively be very useful. Right now, I am vice-leader but I am actually a general because there is no specific rank for that.
    Madperson @ WWW 1
    Level 70, active.


    FEEL MY WRATH!!!

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • SvetovnaSilaSvetovnaSila Posts: 583
    edited 02.11.2012
    Good suggestion madperson, anybody els want to say anything? I know something similar was posted more times on here but still....
    8d1fd513943faaf57ffdb000490cfdee.gif
  • UltimatePenguinUltimatePenguin Posts: 80
    edited 02.11.2012
    i like mad person's idea. and the diplomat!
    UltimatePenguin @ 1
  • PeterKlintingPeterKlinting Posts: 336
    edited 02.11.2012
    I like the sub-leaders and head generals and sergeants
    Always remember to enjoy the game

    PeterKlinting @ international 1
  • SvetovnaSilaSvetovnaSila Posts: 583
    edited 02.11.2012
    Happy you like mine and madperson's idea:)
    8d1fd513943faaf57ffdb000490cfdee.gif
  • DenmanDenman Posts: 428
    edited 03.11.2012
    Maybe you could add a new rank for members who have just joined! plus i love this idea you have totally improved my idea from months ago. good work madperson!
    I consider my troops to be money, that goes out and takes prisoners, that then in turn goes out an takes more prisoners!
    11.jpg
  • SvetovnaSilaSvetovnaSila Posts: 583
    edited 03.11.2012
    So we all suppor madperson's idea atm :). Cool
    8d1fd513943faaf57ffdb000490cfdee.gif
  • naca7naca7 Posts: 82
    edited 03.11.2012
    I think we should just have:
    Leader(max 1)
    Vice-Leader(max 1)
    General(unlimited)
    Sergeant(unlimited)
    Member(unlimited)
    naca7 @ WWW 1
  • nicknamearyanicknamearya Posts: 171
    edited 03.11.2012
    You could also make these ranks available at different alliance levels, so you can have a vice-leader once your level 2, a diplomat when you're level 5, and by the time you're level 20, you'll have lots of different ranks
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    nicknamearya @ en 1
  • LukeWarriorLukeWarrior Posts: 305
    edited 03.11.2012
    I think we should leave it as it is, why is there any need for more ranks? The ones we have do everything we need. Also there have been many threads on this already, search before you post...
    Luke

    I quit the game.
  • Dellow3Dellow3 Posts: 32
    edited 03.11.2012
    Like Vice leader suggestion a lot
    Dellow @ en 1
  • nathan978nathan978 Posts: 256
    edited 03.11.2012
    I love this idea I hope it happends
    nathan978 @ usa 1
  • UltimatePenguinUltimatePenguin Posts: 80
    edited 04.11.2012
    No, it should be sub-leader. it sounds better then vice-leader
    UltimatePenguin @ 1
  • SvetovnaSilaSvetovnaSila Posts: 583
    edited 04.11.2012
    I think we should leave it as it is, why is there any need for more ranks? The ones we have do everything we need. Also there have been many threads on this already, search before you post...
    Luke, I know it was suggested already and btw if moderators do not want this thread open they will close it. Unfortunatley you are not moderator but you would be god if you would be. And yes, we need more because every leader is saying ''my first general'' but that rank do not exist!
    P.S. Vice leader automaticlly become leader if true leader gets out of alliance or gets in ruins
    8d1fd513943faaf57ffdb000490cfdee.gif
  • HenryWarrior5HenryWarrior5 Posts: 248
    edited 04.11.2012
    I think we should leave it as it is, why is there any need for more ranks? The ones we have do everything we need. Also there have been many threads on this already, search before you post...

    We need more ranks like this:
    Leader 1
    Sub Leader 1 he can do what the leader does when he is not online
    1st General 1
    General unlimited
    Sergeants unlimited
    member unlimited
    but i don't want the alliance level counts on this you don't have to have a general or sergeant or a member but you have to have at least 7 members in your alliance
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]


    WARRIORS WILL NEVER DIE!!!!

    If you attack someone have fear even if they are 10 levels less then you....
  • UltimateKing23UltimateKing23 Posts: 188
    edited 01.01.2013
    this is really good actually
    UltimateKing23 @ English 1 as The centurion.
    "for lo the riotous shall live by their faith" Romans Chapter 1 end

    look at my join date. im a real wise one.

    There is no need to over react about a suggestion. if you do well you have anger issues and should try to say no with a constuctive argument. No offence given.
  • MightyJATINMightyJATIN Posts: 41
    edited 01.01.2013
    i really like this idea. :)
    Name:MightyJATIN
    World:International 2
    Level:63
    Honor:1903
    Proud member of Bloody Blades
  • Amander2Amander2 Posts: 94
    edited 01.01.2013
    madperson2 wrote: »
    I definitively agree that there should be more ranks in an alliance. Maybe:

    - Leader (max 1)
    - Vice-leader (max 1)
    - Head general (max 1)
    - Attack Generals (max 2)
    - Defence generals (max 2)
    - Normal Generals (unlimited)
    - Head Sergeant (max 1)
    - Sergeant (unlimited)
    - Member (unlimited)

    That is how I would picture a good alliance. If the leader wants, he doesn't have to use all the specific ranks but in strong alliances like mine, it would definitively be very useful. Right now, I am vice-leader but I am actually a general because there is no specific rank for that.

    That would be so good if we did have that. nice thinking madperson
    Amander @ en 1
  • UltimateKing23UltimateKing23 Posts: 188
    edited 01.01.2013
    total agreement :D
    UltimateKing23 @ English 1 as The centurion.
    "for lo the riotous shall live by their faith" Romans Chapter 1 end

    look at my join date. im a real wise one.

    There is no need to over react about a suggestion. if you do well you have anger issues and should try to say no with a constuctive argument. No offence given.
  • DarkDylan47DarkDylan47 Posts: 759
    edited 01.01.2013
    madperson2 wrote: »
    I definitively agree that there should be more ranks in an alliance. Maybe:

    - Leader (max 1)
    - Vice-leader (max 1)
    - Head general (max 1)
    - Attack Generals (max 2)
    - Defence generals (max 2)
    - Normal Generals (unlimited)
    - Head Sergeant (max 1)
    - Sergeant (unlimited)
    - Member (unlimited)

    That is how I would picture a good alliance. If the leader wants, he doesn't have to use all the specific ranks but in strong alliances like mine, it would definitively be very useful. Right now, I am vice-leader but I am actually a general because there is no specific rank for that.

    I like madpersons and plus diplomat also.
    Dylan42 @ USA1 THE FRONT LINE8)
    DarkDylan47 @ WWW1 HW KnightsOfNi8)
    HAMMER [email protected] United8)

    #TheDreamLivesOn
    Use the search function.
    Support shortcut-http://support.goodgamestudios.com/
    Make Canada1 GGE!
Sign In to comment.