Home› English (UK)› Ideas, Suggestions & Feedback

Join the official Goodgame Discord today!


Are you looking for a community of like-minded gamers to discuss your favorite games with? Look no further than the GoodGame Empire Family Discord Server!


Our server is the perfect place to connect with other gamers from around the world. Whether you're looking to chat about strategy, share tips and tricks, or just make new friends, our community has got you covered.


And that's not all - as a member of our Discord server, you'll also have access to exclusive giveaways and other special events. It's the perfect way to stay up to date on all the latest news and updates from GoodGame Studios.


So what are you waiting for? Join the GoodGame Empire Family Discord Server today and start connecting with fellow warriors from all over the world. Just head to https://discord.gg/goodgamestudios to join the fun!

Realistic Fighting

ElfangorElfangor Posts: 3,974
edited 01.08.2012 in Ideas, Suggestions & Feedback
I was just attacked (again) by an alliance, and my defenses were defeated. Here is what I don't get: When the attackers got to the keep, there were 40 of them left. These were all attacking units (heavy crossbowmen and two-handed swordsmen). There were 132 defenders left! Numbers alone would have favored the defenders. Plus the fact that half of them were DEFENDING units like bowmen and spearmen (the other half being swordsmen)!

I lost all of my remaining troops in the keep while the attacker lost 20! How does that make sense?!

My suggestion is this: make the fighting more realistic! Either make it so you can go out on a battlefield and confront the oncoming army or make numbers a factor!
Post edited by Elfangor on
Check out my story! The First Ruby Buyer

Comments

  • the championthe champion Posts: 270
    edited 13.05.2012
    the reason why you lost is because heavy crossbowmen and two-handed swordsmen are a lot stronger than bowmen and spearmen and swordsmen. he/she might have also got a 30% attacking bonus if they won at 2 of you flanks on your wall.
    the champion @ WWW 1
  • Itt2Itt2 Posts: 63
    edited 13.05.2012
    the champion wrote: »
    the reason why you lost is because heavy crossbowmen and two-handed swordsmen are a lot stronger than bowmen and spearmen and swordsmen. he/she might have also got a 30% attacking bonus if they won at 2 of you flanks on your wall.

    Champion is correct, the attackers were much stronger units.

    But the attacker would have to break through all three sections of the wall to get +30% in the keep.

    If the attacker only breaks through one section of the wall he gets -30% in the keep.

    Two sections there is no bonus in the keep, both sides fight evenly.

    All three sections, the attacker gets +30% in the keep.
  • ElfangorElfangor Posts: 3,974
    edited 13.05.2012
    The fighting was even, but 132 men could still take 40 men down in my opinion, no matter what their skill level. The odds are three to one!
    Check out my story! The First Ruby Buyer
  • LegoNenenLegoNenen Posts: 98
    edited 15.05.2012
    Elfangor wrote: »
    The fighting was even, but 132 men could still take 40 men down in my opinion, no matter what their skill level. The odds are three to one!

    3 to one, i think the Fighting units win.
    look at the Stats sir.
    LegoNenen Castle Of Legon @ World 1
    LegoNenen Castle Of Legon @ English 1
    Empire Guild OLD Applying Center (The Guild is Gone)

    Do not Flame,Spam,or Troll. it is not good or nice to do that.
    The Bible can only be read one way, do not twist the words just to suit your own ideas. (Or anybody's else)


    I try to make my Posts EASIER to READ
    by using these things
    You use it too!

    I Like Star Trek,Star Wars ,Legos , And much more
  • Aldreni-WarriorAldreni-Warrior Posts: 153
    edited 15.05.2012
    You did had Farmers and low defences(Spearmans, bowmans & swordsmans) those 3 are the weakest defenders on the game, and I think 60% of that 132 were Farmers.
    He did win because maybe he had Two-Handed-Swords and Heavy Crossbowmans, you should study the Barracks to know how to attack & defence.
    Have fun

    Dren :)
    Leader of "The Unstoppable" on International 2,

    An experienced alliance wich is part of Bloody Blades Bloodline & I2TO!

    For more informations visit "The Unstoppable" Official Webpagge:

    www.theunstoppable.yolasite.com
  • StrongRoddyStrongRoddy Posts: 44
    edited 15.05.2012
    well when it comes to thinking realistically, each swordsman/crossbowman only had to kill 3 of your defenders before dying himself, and if they are much better trained and equipped, I could completely see how that would be possible. Crossbowmen just shoot into your crowds killing or disabling 1 man per arrow, they only have to do it 3 times, and they probably ended up doing it many more, and the two-handed swords just take a couple big swings at your chainmail equipped spearmen. Makes sense to me
    StrongRoddy @ usa 1 Mali kozji
  • hamzter247hamzter247 Posts: 133
    edited 16.05.2012
    that sucks. they should make it more relistic- especially in the # you have left
    hamzter247 in world 2
    add me as a friend!! u know u want to:)
  • ElfangorElfangor Posts: 3,974
    edited 16.05.2012
    The problem with it is this: the battle shows every unit and group moving in unison. This would not happen in real life because one group could be held back. Plus, it's like the attackers just appeared in the keep and the defenders fell down dead. It just doesn't make sense. Maybe if they put the odds in (like three to one you add the combined defensive power and compare to one attacker) the attacks would be fair.
    Check out my story! The First Ruby Buyer
  • The awesomeness3The awesomeness3 Posts: 31
    edited 27.07.2012
    you just want an excuse to whine because you lost.
    The awesomeness @ usa 1
  • LOL LOL2LOL LOL2 Posts: 566
    edited 27.07.2012
    hamzter247 wrote: »
    that sucks. they should make it more relistic- especially in the # you have left

    Numbers mean nothing against strong quality
    thronking.png
  • The awesomeness3The awesomeness3 Posts: 31
    edited 01.08.2012
    Most of the attackers were HEAVY CROSSBOWMEN they shoot all your guys THERE'S your realistic fighting
    The awesomeness @ usa 1
  • LukeWarriorLukeWarrior Posts: 305
    edited 01.08.2012
    Elfangor wrote: »
    I was just attacked (again) by an alliance, and my defenses were defeated. Here is what I don't get: When the attackers got to the keep, there were 40 of them left. These were all attacking units (heavy crossbowmen and two-handed swordsmen). There were 132 defenders left! Numbers alone would have favored the defenders. Plus the fact that half of them were DEFENDING units like bowmen and spearmen (the other half being swordsmen)!

    I lost all of my remaining troops in the keep while the attacker lost 20! How does that make sense?!

    My suggestion is this: make the fighting more realistic! Either make it so you can go out on a battlefield and confront the oncoming army or make numbers a factor!


    Let me be realistic to you, the spearmen/bowmen are supposed to represent poorly equipped/armoured troops. The Heavy crossbowmen and two hand swords are heavy fighting units that are vastly superior in every way. Thats why you lost.
    Luke

    I quit the game.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Comment As ...