We need new Moderators!
We are always on the lookout for talented people to join the team. That means you! If you think you could help us organise and inform the community while entertaining everyone then apply. We need people to help out on the forum, behind the scenes with announcements, on Discord and on our other Social Media channels.
If this is something you think might be of interest to you, HERE
Comments
So, I am guessing is that there were players who didn't feel comfortable in playing on a multi-lingual server and decided that they wanted to play on the serrver of "their", choice.Secondly, you say that you are a businessman and you deal with numbers, but your argument is based on a very limited pool of data that doesn't show anything other than the number of players going down.Create a spreadsheet and then use it to validate your data and present it in an argument that is coherent, because what I have read is just drivel, et franchement, incomprehensible.
world1 was the default server for everyone since it was a server that was inclusive, and this was probably why the "language', option was added to underneath the alliance name./quote> Did I say anywhere in that sentence that there was a language problem? No, so please read, digest, understand then reformulate your reply that is related because you are not making any sense to anyone.
https://prnt.sc/iULrEm0uO_HP
that is based on other factors put into the equation we have been there before and proved you wrong on that
the fact still remains if your gong to stop 80% of players from spending then in the long term the 20% will not need to spend so much
business who only use that 20/80 without adding the other factors was one reason in the past a lot went bankrupt
also these people are employed by gge 40hrs a week 52 weeks a year so they should be able to do something
the simple thing with updates is that if you spend nothing spend a little or spend alot it is there to keep you playing
and give those who never spend a lot a reason to spend more which is actually what they said
jps ive seen plenty of players spend alot of money on here and i know plenty that had a high budget they played with each month most of them dont spend so much now but what have they gained not alot its still only a game
buying a fancy car is great as you have something in your hand or garage
spending money on here does not give you anything
which goes back to those that spend there pocket money on here they still need something new to spend there money on if gge wants them to carry on spending i for one have stopped spending my pocket money on here as there is nothing to spend it o that will help me
I am not saying businesses should follow 20/80, I am saying it's a proven fact that when you look at a healthy business, 20% makes up for 80%. But you're right, we've been over this before and I will not do it again.
if everybody was a billionaire then nobody would collect your dustbins or nobody would build there boats
also with this game its a balance between those that dont spend those that spend a bit and those that spend a lot
which is what that 20/80 formula is about but if one factor breaks down then over time they all do
so regardless there all important and all need looking after which was my point
as above those companies that use that 20/80 formula and are successful with it
are so because they look after the 20 and they look after the 80
that is keeping the balance and thus not causing any problems
If you remove the current 80% lower/non spenders, the remaining 20% will become the new 100% and that then will split as 20% higher spenders and 80% lesser spenders. Yes the principle still applies but more importantly the overall spending is reduced and GGS will get less. Add the fact that there won’t be as many (easy) targets on the resulting smaller pool and you may see even less spending from those who would remain not to mention the reduced audience for the ads. Remember that a small % of little is way more than 100% of nothing. :)
if you only look after one side then that side will eventually fall apart as well as you need both sides to carry on
an example is above
What I most certainly take issue with is the idea that there are still players out there on all servers that have multiple accounts.Again, I have to cite @Philt123 (GB1) as he is or was a player on GB1 up until a few years ago and he brought up the issue of players constantly botting and trying to flout the rules by using vpns to get their rubies at a cheaper price.
For example, here is a player that @Tarmo (WORLD1)might have been alluding to i.e. a player without a castle.
https://prnt.sc/6h2UH6VoRb11
His might points are massive, more than mine, he still has the fearless title, yet we are told that after x number of days +1 day, the account goes to ruins, then vanishes into thin air. There are players who are level 70 yet still have the title count palantine or lower. How can this be explained? Is it possible that the same player has signed up again, but with the same IP address or e-mail address? All you need is access to the access server and find out if there are any players using a duplicate e-mail address.
i was not pointing anything at you i actually respect your comments as you try to put a different line to it
but when people use excuse like 20/80 rule using that when they dont understand it in full or use it in a way its not ment to be it does not go down well with me sorry and i think you got cought up in it so sorry again
and tarmo you are absolutely correct with any formula all factors need to be balanced not just the top 20 if not that formula does not work anymore
as i said before its best if we drop this line with the 20/80 we have all said about the same so time out on it i think