OUTPOSTS ISSUE

tequila101 (INT1)

Poseidon X Angel said:

tequila101 (INT1) said:

Pisky (GB1) said:

Last time. You were accused of being the multi by another player, who has obviously had enough.

You are also this ****to5 player who capped the op. 
Then ollah attacked but lost again.
So you as ****to5 still hold the op.

We are talking about either 2 players over lvl 800, or 1 player. I dont really get the theme, but i think the stories a bit mixed up now.

the OP issue i think is opening a new game perspective. Players of high level has become bolder in their display of multi-accounts. 

i would assume this "coordinated" counter attack has long been there but not as pronounced as this. 

no 2 players can be alike. granted these ollah and xoreto are 2 different players, 2x a precise coordinated counter attack is a sign that it isn't 2 different players. i'm more inclined to believe that ollah and xoreto are the same.

Now while these could be multis, they could also just be 2 players. Good players know how to time their hits to land on specific seconds, we've done it loads, it's not rocket science Obviously coordinating this is as easy as saying "land at 444:444 at 14:23:00." Or by getting others to time their hits according to yours by copying the timer on their phone.

you could be right, the two players might be sharing the same casket.

tequila101 (INT1)

John Titor (INT1) said:

sirstilgar (US1) said:

bottom line it cost real life money to fully upgrade a op with rubies buildings and some building to max upgrade cost rubies
so each player is taking a chance of losing real life money(rubies) when they build up a op and the op can be taken
and what do we call "taking a chance "Gambling" i.e. take risky action in the hope of a desired result.
so GGE is a game of chance for money. other players time and money when you steal their op


 

Yes you take risky action to build your op and like mod admit it too, when you upset wrong ppl there is not much you can do. This game has some slime bags that many even dont understand, until they send wrong message or attack (or action).

They all ready targeting ppl here just because they write on game forum, huh. And not long time ago blackmailing messages and harassment of one of woman player on GB1. Other game studios takes that kind of stuff seriously but not GGS. That should be police matter, but this game is so marginal that didn't hit the news....

end of the day, it is just a simple pixel game. if an OP is taken from you, it means you are probably an important person. however, no alliance should cry foul about lost OP and brand it as stealing OPs. it is part of the game mechanics. if you lost your OP, go build one. or take back your OP. or take another from another alliance you called "wings".  

it's just pathetic to see big alliances in war using forum to hit the game mechanics and call names to shame them. it's just obviously a display of bitter sense of them.

John Titor (INT1)

tequila101 (INT1) said:

John Titor (INT1) said:

sirstilgar (US1) said:

bottom line it cost real life money to fully upgrade a op with rubies buildings and some building to max upgrade cost rubies
so each player is taking a chance of losing real life money(rubies) when they build up a op and the op can be taken
and what do we call "taking a chance "Gambling" i.e. take risky action in the hope of a desired result.
so GGE is a game of chance for money. other players time and money when you steal their op


 

Yes you take risky action to build your op and like mod admit it too, when you upset wrong ppl there is not much you can do. This game has some slime bags that many even dont understand, until they send wrong message or attack (or action).

They all ready targeting ppl here just because they write on game forum, huh. And not long time ago blackmailing messages and harassment of one of woman player on GB1. Other game studios takes that kind of stuff seriously but not GGS. That should be police matter, but this game is so marginal that didn't hit the news....

end of the day, it is just a simple pixel game. if an OP is taken from you, it means you are probably an important person. however, no alliance should cry foul about lost OP and brand it as stealing OPs. it is part of the game mechanics. if you lost your OP, go build one. or take back your OP. or take another from another alliance you called "wings".  

it's just pathetic to see big alliances in war using forum to hit the game mechanics and call names to shame them. it's just obviously a display of bitter sense of them.

What part exactly you answered on my post? I haven't cried about lost op. Yes, it's part of game mechanism and like I said you take risk losing one if you start build. I either called it stealing, did I? I don't play on GB1 and I don't have account there. You have there sad ppl playing. But that's not news to any one, just look football "fans" of brits.

What is sad that many times the ops are taken via multi account and also many times with low level account. When you hit that flag with lvl 13, it's almost impossible to clean. Cheaters knows this very well. I would change it either that lvl 13 act like lvl what capture made (so lvl 13 caps say lvl 50, then your counter attacks goes like you attack lvl 50 and so on) OR other is that you could capture only equal lvl or lower, not vice versa.  Of course this doesn't prevent captures, but would make it far more fair to original owner.

tequila101 (INT1)

John Titor (INT1) said:

tequila101 (INT1) said:

John Titor (INT1) said:

sirstilgar (US1) said:

bottom line it cost real life money to fully upgrade a op with rubies buildings and some building to max upgrade cost rubies
so each player is taking a chance of losing real life money(rubies) when they build up a op and the op can be taken
and what do we call "taking a chance "Gambling" i.e. take risky action in the hope of a desired result.
so GGE is a game of chance for money. other players time and money when you steal their op


 

Yes you take risky action to build your op and like mod admit it too, when you upset wrong ppl there is not much you can do. This game has some slime bags that many even dont understand, until they send wrong message or attack (or action).

They all ready targeting ppl here just because they write on game forum, huh. And not long time ago blackmailing messages and harassment of one of woman player on GB1. Other game studios takes that kind of stuff seriously but not GGS. That should be police matter, but this game is so marginal that didn't hit the news....

end of the day, it is just a simple pixel game. if an OP is taken from you, it means you are probably an important person. however, no alliance should cry foul about lost OP and brand it as stealing OPs. it is part of the game mechanics. if you lost your OP, go build one. or take back your OP. or take another from another alliance you called "wings".  

it's just pathetic to see big alliances in war using forum to hit the game mechanics and call names to shame them. it's just obviously a display of bitter sense of them.

What part exactly you answered on my post? I haven't cried about lost op. Yes, it's part of game mechanism and like I said you take risk losing one if you start build. I either called it stealing, did I? I don't play on GB1 and I don't have account there. You have there sad ppl playing. But that's not news to any one, just look football "fans" of brits.

What is sad that many times the ops are taken via multi account and also many times with low level account. When you hit that flag with lvl 13, it's almost impossible to clean. Cheaters knows this very well. I would change it either that lvl 13 act like lvl what capture made (so lvl 13 caps say lvl 50, then your counter attacks goes like you attack lvl 50 and so on) OR other is that you could capture only equal lvl or lower, not vice versa.  Of course this doesn't prevent captures, but would make it far more fair to original owner.

how does capturing an OP from another player becomes "stealing" when it is part of game mechanics?

Lucia1 (INT1)

tequila101 (INT1) said:

Lucia1 (INT1) said:

tequila101 (INT1) said:

Pisky (GB1) said:

As I said before if players read through the thread you yourself have been accused of the same, it is about the same op all the time, which I can't see low levels bothering with. Sounds like you like your own posts TBH, and nothing new coming out or relevent.

yes it is the same OP taken from me and am trying to take it back.

I will just resume facts that were told here and in thread A DISEASE THATS ENTER GAME“ which was closed. Outpost which hes trying to capture back is outpost which he also took before from another player - thats why name of outpost was "get me if you can" and that time when was outpost taken by xoreto was it empty outpost without any buildings which was just taken to protect "mikeru" main castle. Outpost was held by tequila101, low level in ruins without any activity in game. Now when xoreto built that OP this account states hes just trying to take his outpost back which isnt true, because first of all it was him who taken that outpost from another player before and second it was just spot on map, empty outpost taken and held by this account tequila101 to protect another player „mikeru“.

More then that, same account who plays tequila101 is played by player involved in taking outposts from kratos 543 - active player who lost two fully built outposts with barracks level 15, granaries level 30, apiary, brewery, all ruby buildings. We got message from tequila101 stating that taking kratos 543 is revange for taking tequila101 outpost (once again, empty spot on map). I can post also printscreen about it which proves that tequila101 and player behind this account connected with „mikeru“ is behind capturing of outposts of our members by "elite" alliance. More info in thread „A DISEASE THATS ENTER GAME“ which was closed

https://prnt.sc/19g1w2u

regardless of what state an OP is, it's still an OP taken. in your previous threads, you call this act of capturing an OP as "stealing". But for you when you take an OP, it's called "capture" which doesn't make any sense.

I don't see here anything wrong, words capturing and stealing are not in contrary. If you are stealing OP you need first capture it. If you ask player who lost fully built OP he will probably say his OP was stealt and there's nothing wrong on it doesn't matter what is game mechanics. Reason is that he spent his real money to build it and those real spent money he loose when someone else capture and take his OP. There's also difference as I mentioned before, I used word capturing OP for OP that wasn't built-empty OP- that means no real money were spent to build that OP. According game mechanics is taking OP allowed but still for player who loose his OP it means loss of his asset in game so  I would resume it with words that its stealing but allowed stealing. In this game is simply stealing allowed. My advice is when someone start stealing from you do the same to him because when stealing is allowed and there's no police or court on game there's only two options repay same or run far and hide.

John Titor (INT1)

tequila101 (INT1) said:

John Titor (INT1) said:

tequila101 (INT1) said:

John Titor (INT1) said:

sirstilgar (US1) said:

bottom line it cost real life money to fully upgrade a op with rubies buildings and some building to max upgrade cost rubies
so each player is taking a chance of losing real life money(rubies) when they build up a op and the op can be taken
and what do we call "taking a chance "Gambling" i.e. take risky action in the hope of a desired result.
so GGE is a game of chance for money. other players time and money when you steal their op


 

Yes you take risky action to build your op and like mod admit it too, when you upset wrong ppl there is not much you can do. This game has some slime bags that many even dont understand, until they send wrong message or attack (or action).

They all ready targeting ppl here just because they write on game forum, huh. And not long time ago blackmailing messages and harassment of one of woman player on GB1. Other game studios takes that kind of stuff seriously but not GGS. That should be police matter, but this game is so marginal that didn't hit the news....

end of the day, it is just a simple pixel game. if an OP is taken from you, it means you are probably an important person. however, no alliance should cry foul about lost OP and brand it as stealing OPs. it is part of the game mechanics. if you lost your OP, go build one. or take back your OP. or take another from another alliance you called "wings".  

it's just pathetic to see big alliances in war using forum to hit the game mechanics and call names to shame them. it's just obviously a display of bitter sense of them.

What part exactly you answered on my post? I haven't cried about lost op. Yes, it's part of game mechanism and like I said you take risk losing one if you start build. I either called it stealing, did I? I don't play on GB1 and I don't have account there. You have there sad ppl playing. But that's not news to any one, just look football "fans" of brits.

What is sad that many times the ops are taken via multi account and also many times with low level account. When you hit that flag with lvl 13, it's almost impossible to clean. Cheaters knows this very well. I would change it either that lvl 13 act like lvl what capture made (so lvl 13 caps say lvl 50, then your counter attacks goes like you attack lvl 50 and so on) OR other is that you could capture only equal lvl or lower, not vice versa.  Of course this doesn't prevent captures, but would make it far more fair to original owner.

how does capturing an OP from another player becomes "stealing" when it is part of game mechanics?

And again, what message I said it stealing? Don't mix me on your own fantasy, thank you.