Bear Grills (US1) said:
That's not an Alliance Tournament. I think I'm gonna cry The reasoning for the change is as logical as Cathy Newman. There's an issue with the reward system so you change the event entirely... the changes don't even have anything to do with the rewards. It appears it still do to glory boosting and it's as if the developers forgot about it entirely and then last second they're like "Oh crap, I just remembered why we stopped that event. Doh! Let's just make it a seasonal event for an alliance vs individual so we can call it a day and go home."
David Noble (US1) said:
Just like all of the other events and invasions it would appear to be that GGS has turned the Shapeshifter event into something where you have to buy rubies to benefit the most out of the event and it still does not address the problem either about concerns of the event being too short or that it may not occur frequently enough if it were to be only five days long. Even with the reduced costs for the set it had better be reduced significantly enough to motivate people to get the full set especially if the event is only going to be five days long and only once a month. Otherwise, it would sound like to me that you might have to buy rubies if you really want the complete set in a timely manner that will not take up to three years or more to get the complete set. ...
Thanatos (RO1) said:
I made the tremendous effort to login just to say that the initial proposed mechanism of the Alliance Tournament is a terrible idea and I ( and many others ) will not compete in it.