Hypocrisy with a capital CG

cheza2000 (GB1)

himnextdoor (GB1) said:

And you know what they say, Mike, or Cheza, or AlderundLowe or whoever you are; people with glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

 And in case there is any confusion here - Mike is Mikeshot2, Cheza is Cheza2000 and Alderundlowe is Adlerundlowe.

Three people,  Three accounts.

My house is made of bricks, I even had a survey done to make sure it was structurally sound. I only throw stones to skip along water because I like the ripples it makes but I am not very good at it so it often goes wrong.

Oh and anyone messaging Cheza (me, just in case you were confused who was speaking) needs to be very careful because I am a woman, and thus a truly delicate little flower playing a war game, and your mail might be intimidating.

mightymike2000 (GB1)

overlord90098 (GB1) said:

whoever is flagging most comments please stop your not funny or helpful 

That comment of ur wasnt helpfull and got a spam flag from me lol since its spam. And if i think something is spam i flag spam ,if i think its abuse i flag abuse , if i think its good i give a like and if i think its lol i give a lol and if neigher i give nothing, simples....

Ive only flagged a few soo far

Whats wrong with flagging or liking or loling???

and if you wish spam this cause it is spam i admit

FamousJohn8 (GB1)

Spam

overlord90098 (GB1) said:

whoever is flagging most comments please stop your not funny or helpful 

UltraFlavoured (GB1)

cheza2000 (GB1) said:

And in case there is any confusion here - Mike is Mikeshot2, Cheza is Cheza2000 and Alderundlowe is Adlerundlowe.

Three people,  Three accounts.

My house is made of bricks, I even had a survey done to make sure it was structurally sound. I only throw stones to skip along water because I like the ripples it makes but I am not very good at it so it often goes wrong.

Although that is meant to reiterate 3 accounts and 3 different players, players have been known to change accounts , due to that being riff at the moment with many accounts changing hands, it does then make it less likely for players to believe the same players are in the same accounts in general. So the accusations then appear. 

This is throughout the whole game and only players within there inner circle such as friends and possible acquaintances is becomes rather easy to use that an an excuse.

They really should ad in extra measures like other games do to minimize the nonsense. 
I for one like to create my own legacy and not fond of trying to uphold someone else's. 

~Ultra

gazz65 (GB1)

Lost of shells

so can anyone say this quickly.

She sells seashells by the seashore. 

50 wood for anyone whose teeth don't fall out trying 2 say it.

cheza2000 (GB1)

UltraFlavoured (GB1) said:

cheza2000 (GB1) said:

And in case there is any confusion here - Mike is Mikeshot2, Cheza is Cheza2000 and Alderundlowe is Adlerundlowe.

Three people,  Three accounts.

My house is made of bricks, I even had a survey done to make sure it was structurally sound. I only throw stones to skip along water because I like the ripples it makes but I am not very good at it so it often goes wrong.

Although that is meant to reiterate 3 accounts and 3 different players, players have been known to change accounts , due to that being riff at the moment with many accounts changing hands, it does then make it less likely for players to believe the same players are in the same accounts in general. So the accusations then appear. 

This is throughout the whole game and only players within there inner circle such as friends and possible acquaintances is becomes rather easy to use that an an excuse.

They really should ad in extra measures like other games do to minimize the nonsense. 
I for one like to create my own legacy and not fond of trying to uphold someone else's. 

~Ultra

Lets not confuse the issue here Ultra. This is not abstract accounts discussion this is answering a post that suggested we are the same person. I am me (always have been, always will be till I quit and my account will go). You know it. Mike is Mike and you know that too. You have worked with the pair of us on skype. Never spoken to Adlerundlowe.

mightymike2000 (GB1)

.

UD1 (INT1)

Man you lot need to get a room  lol 

Fire Devil (GB1)

So can we all sum this up please.  Don't want it dragging along.  Too much crap being chucked around to understand.

From what I have understood, HMD is an attention whore who wants to keep this going as long as possible to confuse us all and get people to notice him, a small useless person in a large world, right?

Mikeshot2 (GB1)

“When it comes to controlling human beings there is no better instrument than lies. Because, you see, humans live by beliefs. And beliefs can be manipulated. The power to manipulate beliefs is the only thing that counts.”
― Michael Ende, The Neverending Story    

skel (GB1)

@Dimnextdoor - the reason I have given up even trying to talk to yourself or "princess" Sharon is .......its hard work and I honestly have way better things to do with my time, hence the decision to let you both burn.

UD1 (INT1)

Guys stop the JAW JAW , go WAR WAR . last man standing the rest do not matter . there are no fair play rules because you do with individuals , we have an Alliance in international one HB they shout fair play , they write the most discusting messages , have a real bad attitude to people do anything they want. but hey we can all play the same game , and once they brake the rule of fair play rules report is save , then we kick there ass where ever the take it.

So get real forget fair plays rules , because i know if one person gets the hump , all rules go out the window lol 

UltraFlavoured (GB1)

cheza2000 (GB1) said:

UltraFlavoured (GB1) said:

cheza2000 (GB1) said:

And in case there is any confusion here - Mike is Mikeshot2, Cheza is Cheza2000 and Alderundlowe is Adlerundlowe.

Three people,  Three accounts.

My house is made of bricks, I even had a survey done to make sure it was structurally sound. I only throw stones to skip along water because I like the ripples it makes but I am not very good at it so it often goes wrong.

Although that is meant to reiterate 3 accounts and 3 different players, players have been known to change accounts , due to that being riff at the moment with many accounts changing hands, it does then make it less likely for players to believe the same players are in the same accounts in general. So the accusations then appear. 

This is throughout the whole game and only players within there inner circle such as friends and possible acquaintances is becomes rather easy to use that an an excuse.

They really should ad in extra measures like other games do to minimize the nonsense. 
I for one like to create my own legacy and not fond of trying to uphold someone else's. 

~Ultra

Lets not confuse the issue here Ultra. This is not abstract accounts discussion this is answering a post that suggested we are the same person. I am me (always have been, always will be till I quit and my account will go). You know it. Mike is Mike and you know that too. You have worked with the pair of us on skype. Never spoken to Adlerundlowe.

My point was -thousands are not the same , never suggested that those 3 accounts are run by totally different players.

The stigma has become guilty until proven innocent , and that's just not accounts that's in game actions too...
(AKA Shout of forum for days on end getting no where)

Or depending on the person and the alliance - 'Rules to fit the occasion'/'One rule for one ,one rule for another'

I suppose childish talk and now turn into childish games such as Musical accounts. The CD must be skipping though.
Once again thats a general comment.

BIGTtheMULLER (INT1) said:

Guys stop the JAW JAW , go WAR WAR . last man standing the rest do not matter . there are no fair play rules because you do with individuals , we have an Alliance in international one HB they shout fair play , they write the most discusting messages , have a real bad attitude to people do anything they want. but hey we can all play the same game , and once they brake the rule of fair play rules report is save , then we kick there ass where ever the take it.

So get real forget fair plays rules , because i know if one person gets the hump , all rules go out the window lol 

I believe half are unofficial warring although theres are a 45 player difference between the two alliances. 
Also seems likes its spilled out of the game itself.

~Ultra 

cheza2000 (GB1)

himnextdoor (GB1) said:

No Cheza, you did not. And nor have you yet either addressed my claim or demonstrated even that you understand the claim being made. What you did in fact was, you made a claim of your own.

Imagine you are sat on a chair, shivering, and I state, 'It's hot.' You say 'No, it is not' but would you have 'denied' or 'refuted' my claim by doing so? No, you would not have... You might even say, 'No, it's cold' but all you would have done is made a claim yourself. Do you see? You might say you are cold and I might say, 'Yes, it's freezing in here' but still, you haven't denied my claim... You've made an assumption about my claim and then made a counter-claim... NOW do you see?

When I said, 'It's hot', I was referring to the plate I had just taken out of the oven... see? You haven't denied my claim at all have you?

Now, when you said that Praetorians don't threaten women, were you actually saying that Mike did not threaten Sharon? I mean, at that point, you hadn't even seen the PM I was referring to, had you? How can you deny something that you are not referring to; that you are not even aware of? You can't; you made a knee-jerk claim to something you assumed I was saying but which I hadn't yet said.

However, you have now seen the PM that Mike sent to Sharon and you are now in a position to refuse to accept the truth of the claim I made... would you like to do that now? Here is what Mike said:

"My motive (for hitting you) was for you to keep in one place - and not keep popping in to BSK-CG war...."

Mike states here that he had a motive for hitting Sharon which falsifies his claim that it was an arbitrary hit and by implication, he is making a threat against her... I mean clearly, Mike is not saying, 'Now I have punished you, you are free to do as you wish just as Fool, HakHat and Last Shadow are', is he?

You may, if you wish, now claim that no reasonable person could perceive Mike's message to Sharon as a threat but by doing so, you would of course invite criticism of either your comprehension skills or your failure to take a non-partisan view on the issue.

Refute this if you will but be aware that to do so would compromise your integrity.

To refute is to deny, Deny is to refuse to accept a statement made as fact. Look it up. 

I deny the statement 'Praetorians intimidate women' is fact. If you do not mean this then you lacked specificity in your original statement and are responsible for all implications that can reasonably be inferred from your words and can thus easily clarify your original intent and apologise for any confusion and anger caused by your ill chosen words.

To demonstrate praetorians intimidate women, you would need messages from multiple praetorian players to multiple women not just one message from one player to another (and I do not believe that message constitutes 'intimidation to women' in the slightest).  

Your reply has failed to address the demeaning, condescending and sexist ("No dear...") tone / comments that you used in your prior post and has in fact continued in this post in the same manner.

My purpose for commenting on this thread was to deny the statement that 'praetorians intimidate women' in case others took your words as fact. I have done this. I am a woman and a praetorian and do not believe this statement has any basis. I do not believe you are prepared to reconsider your position and will in fact cling to it dogmatically, regardless of the lack of evidence.

At this point, if Itchy spent 6 hours in a skype room discussing issues with you, I would like to nominate her for Sainthood.

gazz65 (GB1)

Lovely stroll down beach and caught the sun.
has this still not been sorted christ read war and peace quicker then this thread.

Mikeshot2 (GB1)

I would never "tell anyone to keep their mouth shut"

I wish to Gawd - you would though HND

itchtytwit (GB1)

himnextdoor (GB1) said:

Indeed they are.

http://prnt.sc/c9k7pn

I want us to be clear about a few things Toe, HakHat, Toerag, CleanerChampion, or whoever. Itchy sent this to one of our members earlier:

http://prnt.sc/c9bich

The part underlined in red is an unadulterated lie; a disgusting and gross misrepresentation of the facts.

http://prnt.sc/c9l1yv

The above screenshot shows the end of the Skype conversation that Itchy refers to in the previous link. Does that look like I admitted that CG didn't break any rules in front of ANYONE? And in any case, if I had agreed that no rules had been broken, why would I be seeking a resolution?

Now, I will only call a spade a spade here and the fact is that I have just presented conclusive evidence that Itchy is a manipulative liar... There is nothing defamatory about saying that; it is what it is and equally Toe, I do not regard your words as being worth the paper they are written on... And that's where we stand in that regard.

I do not trust you, Toe, I know Itchy to be as dishonest as the day is long and Skel... well, let's just say he compliments you and Itchy perfectly and besides, WE are the aggrieved party and it is you whom ought to be making reparations to us for the lies and the defamation and the damage you have inflicted upon us... We have something of a problem... I would choose death over bondage, and it seems that the truth that would set us free would be a chain that imprisons CG.




Ok so thats your opinion HND, let people decide with more facts maybe?

http://prnt.sc/c9w8v7

http://prnt.sc/c9w9vg

http://prnt.sc/c9waky

http://prnt.sc/c9wb59

http://prnt.sc/c9wc9q