Home EN General Discussions & Questions

Join the official Goodgame Big Farm Discord today!Join our Big Farm Discord Server


Are you looking for a community of like-minded farmers to discuss your farming experience with? Look no further than the GoodGame Big Farm Discord Server!


Our server is the perfect place to connect with other farmers from around the world. Whether you're looking to chat about strategy, share tips and tricks, or just make new friends, our community has got you covered.


And that's not all - as a member of our Discord server, you'll also have access to exclusive giveaways and other special events. It's the perfect way to stay up to date on all the latest news and updates from GoodGame Studios.


So what are you waiting for? Join the GoodGame Big Farm Discord Server today and start connecting with fellow farmers from all over the world. Just click here to join the fun!

Mission Suggestion

I suggest that whenever a player don't want to continue the mission,there must be an option for it.The option should be situated below the Hint:...............
Reason:
I'm telling this because whenever the player is getting problem with mission(mean For examle:The player cannot afford this thing or something is being produce takes a long time)
Note:When the player left the mission he will not be able to join another because some players can abuse it by leaving and joining.When he/she will click on find a mission it will say "You cannot join this mission as you left the other mission.You will have to wait for this to finish then you will be able".
Like to produce dung some players get problem about it as some dont have enough 'wild flowers','wheat','corn',etc.
Extra:
This will be useful for everyone especially the newbies who cannot afford for some things.
Post edited by Cashew (INT1) on

Comments

  • Stace8 (GB1)Stace8 (GB1) Posts: 9
    edited 13.09.2014
    I find missions annoying when people don't add. I think in some missions where you are able to add, and don't there should be penalty points. I understand that if you have full gardens and you get a corn mission for instance then its not possible. But if you get an egg mission for example everyone can add to this even if its a low amount. I have been told that the winner of the mission get's less certificates, is this true? Or is it that if you don't add to certain missions you get another benefit from it? I find it very annoying if you are in a mission with 3 other people and not one of thme adds anything, why do the mission in the first place, if you are able to add say eggs etc?
  • Kevin3Farmer2Kevin3Farmer2 Posts: 36
    edited 13.09.2014
    There's a possible excuse for this. It used to be you could choose a mission. Now you have to enter a lottery, and you may get a mission you don't want. I may be all primed to do dung, but get eggs. I know my coop will be doing eggs as soon as I deliver enough milk. Should I donate eggs for your benefit, or hold them for the benefit of my coop? Should I dump the milk just so that I can benefit you both, but pass on my chance to use it in a favorable mission for myself? And this is just one way it may play out.
  • rhinanarhinana Posts: 561
    edited 13.09.2014
    Stace85 wrote: »
    I find missions annoying when people don't add. I think in some missions where you are able to add, and don't there should be penalty points. I understand that if you have full gardens and you get a corn mission for instance then its not possible. But if you get an egg mission for example everyone can add to this even if its a low amount. I have been told that the winner of the mission get's less certificates, is this true? Or is it that if you don't add to certain missions you get another benefit from it? I find it very annoying if you are in a mission with 3 other people and not one of thme adds anything, why do the mission in the first place, if you are able to add say eggs etc?

    I strongly disagree on penalizing people for not contributing. What if you have to leave your computer suddenly or lose your internet connection?

    Also missions are all about strategy. Some people deliberately save their goods for a mission where they know they can win and gain more certificates. We shouldn't be penalizing them because they have a strategy that other players don't like.
  • farmerjohn 22 (US1)farmerjohn 22 (US1) US1 Posts: 37,770
    edited 13.09.2014
    There's a possible excuse for this. It used to be you could choose a mission. Now you have to enter a lottery, and you may get a mission you don't want. I may be all primed to do dung, but get eggs. I know my coop will be doing eggs as soon as I deliver enough milk. Should I donate eggs for your benefit, or hold them for the benefit of my coop? Should I dump the milk just so that I can benefit you both, but pass on my chance to use it in a favorable mission for myself? And this is just one way it may play out.


    You make a good point. Since a player loses nothing by not participating, many don't do so because they are prepared for a different mission and not the one they're given. But when I'm able to, I always try to make some effort to put some numbers on the board. Of course, that may not be possible if all your fields are planted with the wrong crop. No penalty needed.
  • eishaheishah Posts: 129
    edited 13.09.2014
    You make a good point. Since a player loses nothing by not participating, many don't do so because they are prepared for a different mission and not the one they're given. But when I'm able to, I always try to make some effort to put some numbers on the board. Of course, that may not be possible if all your fields are planted with the wrong crop. No penalty needed.
    I also support you here...:thumbup:

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file