Home EN Discussion Corner for the official announcements

Join the official Goodgame Big Farm Discord today!Join our Big Farm Discord Server


Are you looking for a community of like-minded farmers to discuss your farming experience with? Look no further than the GoodGame Big Farm Discord Server!


Our server is the perfect place to connect with other farmers from around the world. Whether you're looking to chat about strategy, share tips and tricks, or just make new friends, our community has got you covered.


And that's not all - as a member of our Discord server, you'll also have access to exclusive giveaways and other special events. It's the perfect way to stay up to date on all the latest news and updates from GoodGame Studios.


So what are you waiting for? Join the GoodGame Big Farm Discord Server today and start connecting with fellow farmers from all over the world. Just click here to join the fun!

Update 18.03. - Happiness achieved

1858

Comments

  • studbuzzrd (US1)studbuzzrd (US1) Posts: 29
    edited 14.03.2014
    I can assure you GGS. If you change this after I have spent all this time and resources, I WILL NEVER PURCHASE A PENNY OF GOLD AGAIN. EVER! I've got my farm just the way I like it based on the rules. There's way too many other games to play without being cheated out of what I worked for. if I have achieved 100 happiness. it should be mine to keep. If it is a décor that is a 4X4, then it should stay a 4x4. If I have purchased a land tract, then it should stay the same space the next morning as I left it the night before. I have been a business man and entrepreneur for 20 years and this is beyond a stupid idea!
  • Chery (GB1)Chery (GB1) Posts: 15
    edited 14.03.2014
    Latten wrote: »
    Again: You won't notice a huge difference at all - It will be noticable if you get very close to 100%, or if you discard decoration completely. If you're not in these areas, you will even have a notable push in Happiness.

    I can see what GGS wants us to do here. They want everyone to buy decorations & use them on our farms. FINE !!! I do that! I maintain a -100% on all 3 farms continually. I have for a very long time. Leaving me with a 0 running cost. I have spent plenty of gold to maintain that balance. Why am I & others like me, being punished for the players that do not want to play with decorations on their farms? That makes NO sense at all!
    AND YOU ALL - GGS - KNOW IT TOO!!
    There will be peace in the big farm, if you leave us with our 0 running costs. Otherwise... I'm thinking you will loose a LOT of very Happy, Wealthy, game players, just to make the farm workers Happy? Have you all lost your pea pickin minds? BAH!
  • Twiglet (GB1)Twiglet (GB1) GB1 Posts: 1,174
    edited 14.03.2014
    i didnt read about the not buying gold bit i just read a part about saying we have to have decorations on our farms which if i choose not to have decs on my main farm that should be my choice its a game and you play it how best suits you as a player but the gold bit what do you mean by it ??? if you don't buy gold you will be banned from the game ??? i thought this was a game you could choose to play for free? i have bought gold but if i have to destroy all my main farm then this gold as gone down the drain is this fair on the players?
  • momoma (GB1)momoma (GB1) Posts: 29
    edited 14.03.2014
    GGS policies obviously breed greed...
  • Griffith (INT1)Griffith (INT1) Posts: 768
    edited 14.03.2014
    for those of you who offended me or called without brain cell i suggest some anger management sessions or academic classes about logistics. this update is "actually" a change, finally, unlike the last few updates which were totally useless, & you guys that called me newbie ok yea i played 2 month and im lvl 55 so i dont think im a pro if you think you are good for you, but my question is you been playing for like 1 year and doing same stuff and didnt get bored already? and now are whining cause the happiness system is actually becoming more reasonable and not letting low lvl players to go straight to +300% from the start anymore and those of us who loved events dont get bored cause they knew they will have to get rid of decos whether they win it or not? grow up. if you're a paying customer and are bored, leave dont whine, we new players will replace you and enjoy instead. or just be happy that there's finally some changes that will make you change your ways of playing and enjoy a bit more at least rather than doing same stuff over and over again.

    p.s. all my 3 farms been around -100% from start of game and im not one bit unhappy if it drops to -90% now, cause i had no choice in the old system but to go to +300% and ignore events anyway (cause decos was almost useless). but now i can let that happen gradually instead while enojoying events, keeping and changing some decos, removing some, upgrading stuff to higher lvls and dropping happiness bit by bit till i either stop at -25% happiness, or even go further and go to +500% cause those will be the optimum points of new system.

    back to my question
    Latten:
    can you explain some more about the booster adjustment and new icons that you mentioned?
  • SirGeorge (US1)SirGeorge (US1) Posts: 354
    edited 14.03.2014
    Latten wrote: »
    http://en.board.goodgamestudios.com/bigfarm/showthread.php?101703

    Have fun discussing :) This might be an exciting one, so be sure to keep it civil ;)

    When the Community Manager starts the thread and gives a warning like this, you know it's going to get bad. Not only will it be bad, but they (GGS) acknowledges it in advance. Wow.

    This must not be an easy decision, they are admitting defeat in their own game. The mass production farm was never intended by the game makers, so they must be embarrassed.

    This update is sour grapes. Ignore our decorations that we pay our art department to develop? We'll fix you.
  • Griffith (INT1)Griffith (INT1) Posts: 768
    edited 14.03.2014
    SirGeorge wrote: »
    This must not be an easy decision, they are admitting defeat in their own game. The mass production farm was never intended by the game makers, so they must be embarrassed.

    that is not true, ofc this makes mass production farms earn some less, but if they "really" be mass production farm.
    a farm with architect lvl productions or very high lvl productions will still make tons of money without any deco even at 500%. but this means those who after lvl 30 gone to +300% with like 20 lvl 3 cowsheds have to rethink a bit, cause thats not mass production that was just bad formula and abuse of it by players.
  • Kat Nip (GB1)Kat Nip (GB1) GB1 Posts: 3,796
    edited 14.03.2014
    jatoda wrote: »
    have they ever got it fixed where the gold we buy is put in our account. earlier today no on was getting their gold. I am not buying any till I am sure I will get it. not boycotting just want the gold I buy.
    Jatoda, you'll need to contact Support if you've purchased gold and it isn't in your account sorry. I'm not aware of there being any problem with it at the moment however, but then I haven't spoken to the CM's today either.
    pixie2me2 wrote: »
    Katnip, as a moderator I think at the moment its very hard for you, but I think players who pay exceedingly vast sums of real life money for this game are entitled to "vent" their angst, are entitled to leave the game - if they so choose to and are entitled to "no longer spend gold", if that is their choice.

    That many may do this all at once DUE TO GGS's updates that is not players faults that is because players, as a whole are angry and will express this in whatever way they see fit.

    I consider being told that "there is a threat" waiting to happen via GGS for anyone choosing to make a different decision on their gold spend or playing the game is unbelievable in its intent - my goodness its a game - a very expensive one but a game - but now I'm wondering what is it if threats can be bandied about...

    Wow I'm amazed...
    Pixie, I apologise if I didn't phrase it correctly - there is no threat, just a heads up that if someone is going about organising a gold purchasing boycott, there can be some serious consequences. I really like this community and I don't want anyone to end up in trouble for doing something like that. I'm sorry that you read my post as a threat - it in no way was meant to be one at all.

    Everyone is completely entitled to do with their money as they believe is correct and if that means not purchasing gold, purchasing less of it or even maintaining their regular purchases, then so be it. I'll continue doing what I wish with my own money just like everyone else will so it would be incredibly hypocritical of me to even suggest otherwise.

    As for expressing their anger, I've already said in this thread that I do understand where they're coming from. If you'll notice, I've done very little modding of this thread with the exception of removing other games from it, the occasional very off topic post and my post explaining that there can be consequences for organised boycotting of gold purchasing. That's simply because I feel that it's more important for everyone to be able to express how they're feeling at this moment than to worry about double posts and other trivial matters. The forum is after all, the outlet for feedback on the game. I wouldn't have said anything at all about gold boycotting except other members brought it up in the thread.

    Hopefully this clears things up Pixie. :)

    Kat. Kittie_by_otomosc.gif
  • jatoda (US1)jatoda (US1) Posts: 318
    edited 14.03.2014
    I have not purchased gold, but there are several who did there is a long long long post about it in the technical and bugs. just wondering if anyone had heard anything. they were buying gold and it was not posting to their account. that was this morning.
  • Big Bob3Big Bob3 Posts: 53
    edited 14.03.2014
    Attachment not found.
    Did I not spend enough gold to be allowed to build my farm this way? Do the 12 gold bought tractors, 1 trailer, 3 unicorns, 5 playgrounds, 2 duck ponds, 6 pavilions, and 2 tree houses sitting in storage count for nothing? I suppose that I am a terrible person for spending money on a game I have enjoyed and need to be put in my place simply because I have actual farm buildings on my farm and not 50 decorations. Shame on me. Bad Big Bob
  • Griffith (INT1)Griffith (INT1) Posts: 768
    edited 14.03.2014
    Big Bob3 wrote: »
    Attachment not found.
    Did I not spend enough gold to be allowed to build my farm this way? Do the 12 gold bought tractors, 1 trailer, 3 unicorns, 5 playgrounds, 2 duck ponds, 6 pavilions, and 2 tree houses sitting in storage count for nothing? I suppose that I am a terrible person for spending money on a game I have enjoyed and need to be put in my place simply because I have actual farm buildings on my farm and not 50 decorations. Shame on me. Bad Big Bob

    your farm will still make good money. the part you dont get about new update is it does not let newbies to make such farms with low lvl buildings anymore, since you already have architect lvl buildings and so on, you will still be earning as good as who have optimized his/her farm at -25% at end game with some deco and less production instead.

    p.s. i need to remind you guys that these changes seem to be related to eachother. what I mean?
    new gourmet will earn its own dung soon, that means if you make less money at 500% instead of 300%, yet after gourmet revamp since you be needing less dung (for almonds) you can remove some cowshed and fields and make more apples and cherries instead and your money making will be as good as old system. and furthermore itll give you a choice to change your farm in a way that if you want to do master lvl events and enjoy them too or not, cause in old system for old players, any event was useless anyway cause decos had no meaning in end game. do you guys want to not change anything at all anymore in your farms? then why you still play honestly...
  • Agons000 (AU1)Agons000 (AU1) Posts: 39
    edited 14.03.2014
    Well well well, pretty obvious this was going to happen, thanks to the geniuses who couldn't keep the +300% "mass production farms" a secret, but then again, sooner or later, they would have found out anyway. Of course they're not going to make things easy for us, it's their way of getting us to buy more gold.
  • KingTuT (INT1)KingTuT (INT1) Posts: 49
    edited 14.03.2014
    Eleven pages of outrage. It appears to me that the outrage is more frustration. From long term players who have reach the higher levels and basically run out of NEW things to concentrate on, so they have come up with a new strategy to increase their interest in the game. From other players whom have worked and spent money to achieve the -100% benchmark that was the ultimate achievement according to the rules of the game. The frustration level must have just hit the boiling point with the latest announced update.
    First, I like the idea of the new AP achievement expansion. This area of the game seems to reach a point where the “quests” are so large that it takes forever to reach the next level. New challenges – always a great idea.
    Second, the clarification of the Prime Days “water tank” will reduce the number of post by new player who didn’t understand and felt “ripped off” when they didn’t get what they thought they should. Again – Clarification is always a good thing.
    Third, I really don’t understand the need for the “booster window”. I bought the books, I spent gold to do it, and I know how it affects my production. If someone owns a library book all they have to do is look at the information screen for that book and it will tell them EXACTLY what the benefit is. Seems like a waste of a programmers time and our screen space.
    Fourth -- the Happiness changes (sigh). I am one of the players who has worked hard to achieve the -100% on two of my farms and approaching it on the third. This was no easy feat. I do feel that I am being punished by GGS by having my achievement taken away from me for NO GOOD REASON. Every player, regardless of how they run their farm IS playing within the rules of the game. Truthfully, only the upper level players, whom have already maxed out their farms can do this profitably. Chances are that if the fourth farm had been added, no one would have considered this type of farming. This change is detrimental to the happiness of the PLAYERS, real people. Why worry about the “workers”, fictional PIXALS.
    Fifth, the appearance of a true responsive appreciation from GGS towards the players seems to be non-existent. While we (the forum users) appreciate the Moderators and other VOLUNTEER members whom help keep us informed, there is a decided lack of interest in the players desires for changes. I understand that you cannot please all people all the time, but a majority should be listened too.
    Sixth, although I have no intention of joining a “gold boycott”, it is a time honored tradition of displaying a persons’ displeasure at a untenable situation in order to draw a maximum of attention to the problem. Why would there be any “concequences” to someone whom wishes to protest in this fashion? Why not allow the “boycotting players” (assuming they organize) designate their representative to communicate with representative of GGS to resolve the issues?
    And Finally (yes, I am about done), while I understand the desire to maintain secrecy for a NEW product or design, changes to the basic rules of the game should be placed openly in the forum well before the changes are implemented. With this I am speaking directly to the “happiness formula”. As a mid-level player this change may or may not affect my overall play in the game, however I still feel as though I am being punished by losing my achievement, cheated by having spent a lot of time strategizing to reach my goal and disrespected by GGS for assuming that this is a minor change not worthy of advance notice to allow for a change in long term planning.
    The question at hand is will GGS listen to the outrage being posted in the game forum, or will it be ignored and allow the remaining players (so many have declared they are done) see what our opinions mean to the company which we support with our hard earned dollars purchasing their product.
  • MirahhMirahh Posts: 77
    edited 14.03.2014
    Can you moderators please tell me, if there is anyone from GGS who ever reads about comments in forum?
    Or is it just you moderators who are telling them what is going on here.
    Can you please tell them, that I (i think someone else too?) like to have some answers here. People are commenting a lot, that they do not like the update and i was thinking that GGS must give an answer here.
    I really like to hear something from GGS. (sorry poor english)
  • Lilypaddle (INT1)Lilypaddle (INT1) Posts: 614
    edited 14.03.2014
    I seem to be the only one who doesn't mind the happiness change. Though, I also enjoy a little challenge in my game.

    Yes it really makes no difference to me either. I have my happiness pretty high but don't really give the rest of it that much thought. I play this game to relax not to stress myself out. All this change can only stress you out if you let it. For me life is too short to worry about the little things.
  • tgbill (US1)tgbill (US1) Posts: 2
    edited 14.03.2014
    i dont know how ggs thinks that everytime it suits their money needs they can change the game just enough to meet their needs and forget about the players. I buy plenty of gold or should i say did because i am not funding ggs retirement anymore. We have waited for the 4th farm long enough that should of had the same rules as the others but why not keep changing them no ones griping enough for the extra money they will be making. Well listen up enough is enough. i understand the game has to make but thats all it is now the game is how much and how often you get to buy gold with real money.You had to know there would be a last straw and THIS IS IT. No more gold buying give me a game i can play and dont make up the rules as you go along. they are 1 sided and it does not lean my way. you cant keep making the same mountian higher to keep us interested and give a new 10 feet to climb after we have reached the top. if i were playing card you sir would be a cheater make the rules as you go.you have alot of good people supporting your game as i have in this and empire that i already quit playing trust me you make me leave this one and the next will not be a ggs game
  • FarmerTess (AU1)FarmerTess (AU1) Posts: 2,393
    edited 14.03.2014
    Mirahh wrote: »
    Can you moderators please tell me, if there is anyone from GGS who ever reads about comments in forum?
    Or is it just you moderators who are telling them what is going on here.
    Can you please tell them, that I (i think someone else too?) like to have some answers here. People are commenting a lot, that they do not like the update and i was thinking that GGS must give an answer here.
    I really like to hear something from GGS. (sorry poor english)

    GGS staff will not be at work for another 30 mins at least. They are in Germany. Yes they do read the comments and moderators also let staff know along with the links of threads that need immediate attention.
    The same goes for suggestions and problems and questions. :)
  • Twiglet (GB1)Twiglet (GB1) GB1 Posts: 1,174
    edited 14.03.2014
    what i have decided to do because it is hard enough to get players to sit long enough to do projects and get them completed without me having to have my farm built to the hilt with apples and chicken coops so we can complete them i have decided that our co op will no longer do projects we will just use our co op as a meeting place to play (build our farms the way we want them) and chat we will do the research which gives us the cash to build our farms up to how we want them. so no more pressure to finish projects as these will no longer be an issue. just sit back and relax and collect and build the farms and have a good natter :) problem solved
  • pixie2me2pixie2me2 Posts: 83
    edited 14.03.2014
    Hey Katnip,

    I just saw your reply and thank you for clarification :) I do hope GGS wont go as far as to boycott any player who boycotts this latest update though... :)
  • Beanbonne (SKN1)Beanbonne (SKN1) Posts: 5
    edited 14.03.2014
    jaystarr2 wrote: »
    5. The backstory/fluffy explanation provided for this change doesn't even make sense:

    "Workers on some farms have informed us that they are not happy about the fact that they don't get a lot of decorations to look at anymore and that all their attempts to get you to put up more decos by increasing production costs seems to have failed. They feel forced to increase production costs even more if you completely ignore their wish for some decos on your farm."[/b]

    If I could, I would demolish all the worker houses. Then give them the option of commuting to work, or I would just hire someone else now that I have my own airport and harbour to bring in workers! With all those houses gone, I would have even more animals!

    LOL
  • george3 (AU1)george3 (AU1) AU1 Posts: 411
    edited 14.03.2014
    pixie2me2 wrote: »
    Hey Katnip,

    I just saw your reply and thank you for clarification :) I do hope GGS wont go as far as to boycott any player who boycotts this latest update though... :)
    Hi Pixie can you see the poor buggers turning up to face this lot, I think I'd chuck a sickie
  • bøffe (SKN1)bøffe (SKN1) Posts: 383
    edited 14.03.2014
    maxiroy2 wrote: »
    Yes it really makes no difference to me either. I have my happiness pretty high but don't really give the rest of it that much thought. I play this game to relax not to stress myself out. All this change can only stress you out if you let it. For me life is too short to worry about the little things.

    I so agree with you maxiroy - I really think everybody should take a deep breath and reconsider :):)
    I will continue to play, and from time to time buy a little gold.
    I really don't think that this update is that big a deal
  • gyodafgyodaf Posts: 55
    edited 14.03.2014
    Let's see some point of view.

    - From many players who have "mass-production farm, no deco" point of view:
    I'm very angry!!! This update will cost me much at +500%! GGS cheat us by changing basic rule. It's not fair !!! I've spent so much effort to make this farm fully functional.

    - From some players who have bought some gold deco point of view:
    In this mission, my 8 chicken coop compete with a player who has 19 chicken coop with no deco. It seems this player never buy gold deco at all. Then, why th* h*ll i spent real money to buy these gold deco if in someday become completely useless ???

    - From GGS point of view:
    Hmmm...this is not good. Mass production farms begin to spread everywhere and ignoring deco. Our sales of gold deco is declining. Other players will think, what's the need of buying gold deco. They find a away to exploit our basic rule: balancing production and happiness. Focusing on one side will make the other side suffers. Let's do something about this.


    Who will "win" ?
  • Latten (DE1)Latten (DE1) Posts: 6,246
    edited 14.03.2014
    back into paying costs in their farms when it cost us lost of time and for some real money to achive the 100% is not a good idea![/QUOTE]

    Of course we care :( But since the game right now can be played in a way that's absolutely not intended (at least not without consequences) we had to change things up a bit to make both styles ("Deco farm" and "Industry farm") equally valid, and not putting one massively over another.
    I so glad there are still us optimistic people out there. :)
    I really dislike all the negativity on the forums, but it is what it is, there will also be some people who like something and other people who don't like that thing.
    I prefer to look at the good side of things, for this update the Achievements.

    So once again I will say, good job GGS, and I can't wait until Tuesday!

    ~Space~

    Thank you for staying positive :) Again, I'm sure this won't be that big of a deal as people might expect right now.
    mork2262 wrote: »
    Yep, Im leaving. I do need an experienced player to take over running the co-op (woodgate farm). We are top20 on EN1, loads of good active players. Send me a message, make the application interesting, others will be choosing you. Only level 70 and above please.

    Of course this is an option, but trust me when I say I'd be very sad to see people go over this change. There is so much content coming up this year, lots and lots of stuff for experienced and new players, and it would be a shame if you guys would miss it, since I think you would really, really like it :)
    Windy Lynn wrote: »
    If you look real close at 'Latten's' post, he is blaming this update on us.

    He clearly states, "Workers on some farms have informed us that they are not happy about the fact that they don't get a lot of decorations to look at anymore and that all their attempts to get you to put up more decos by increasing production costs seems to have failed."

    So what this says is that he and those like him who work on these upgrades don't like the fact that some of our farms don't have the décor on it and they have tried numerous ways to try and change that. So it's because HE'S not happy and those who work with him aren't happy.

    I.. don't... what? :D I can assure you that wasn't my intention at all! (Also, I didn't even write the text this time around ^^)
    I get what this is REALLY about. It has nothing to do with what GGS perceives to be "correct game play". But it has everything to do with, once again, forcing all players to buy more of your high value decorations with gold to place on your farm to keep your running costs down so that GGS makes even more money.

    It really doesn't. Why would we risk this degree of backlash over a substantial feature of the game, "just" because we'd like to sell more gold? There are probably literally hundreds of better ways to do this. This change is only due to exactly two things happening in the game right now:
    a) more and more decoration from events etc, and a lot more of that on the horizon
    b) (the bigger one): "Industrial farms" that scrap decoration completely, which basically invalidates half of the original game design and was never intended to work as well as it does now.

    And following up on that..
    nonon82 wrote: »
    This is not at all what the game is supposed to be

    I can't believe you actually came out and said it. Surely you want to maintain at least the illusion of choice? Let us think that we choose how we play. This game is already on rails for the most part. Why can't I build 6 barns, or 4 mills on my farm if I choose to use my space that way? Because you don't like it?

    We _want_ people to play the way they like to, that's exactly why this change is needed. If you want to play with an industry farm (I'll just call them like that in lack of a better word), you can now do so without completely breaking the balancing of the game. You still will have a massive production boost, and you still will have a way better chance to clear projects or missions. You will only have to pay more Farmdollars to do so, which revalidates an originally invalid way to play.

    All right, I hope I didn't miss too much in here.
  • bøffe (SKN1)bøffe (SKN1) Posts: 383
    edited 14.03.2014
    Well Latten, for all it is worth, it makes sense to me :)
  • Gamle-mormor2Gamle-mormor2 Posts: 7
    edited 14.03.2014
    Dessa decorationer tar sån stor yta att det blir svårt att hänga med när uppdragen säger ex.bygg en stall till.Då blir allternativet all ställa någon/några deco i förrådet och då går driftkostnaden högre.Så vad har man för allternativ om man vill hänga med i spelets gång? Decona har 4x4 kan minskas till 3x3 ta bort de tomma rutorna.

    [Google Translate: These decorationer take such a big area that it becomes difficult to keep up with when assignments are saying ex.bygg a stall till.Då becomes allternativet all set someone / some decoration in the store and then go running cost högre.Så what it has been for allternativ if you want to hang with in the game? Decona have 4x4 is reduced to 3x3 remove the empty boxes.

    Hey Gamle,

    don't forget that we are always adding in more decoration (and probably decoration with more happiness in the future, too), and more and more features as well, of course. The upcoming changes might have a noticable effect for some players, but I'm sure we will deliver tools to deal with it way better than just adding more land.

    Latten]
  • Latten (DE1)Latten (DE1) Posts: 6,246
    edited 14.03.2014
    bøffe3 wrote: »
    Well Latten, for all it is worth, it makes sense to me :)

    That's worth a lot to me :D

    We're really not trying to annoy you guys on purpose here, but sometimes the game needs to be changed up a bit when certain developements occur that go against the initial structure of the basic game design. This is one of those changes, and we're of course aware that it would cause some anger from players who are (or even aren't) affected by this, and we're really sorry about that. But in the end, it's necessary to keep the game properly balanced and running well.
  • pumpingboy (GB1)pumpingboy (GB1) Posts: 51
    edited 14.03.2014
    Agree with you
    all GG are after is getting players to buy more and more gold
    Oh and by the way you will find that that offer will not come up again same as the +100% offer only once

    I agree with most players arguments here
  • Gamle-mormor2Gamle-mormor2 Posts: 7
    edited 14.03.2014
    Tycker som Big Bob3 Det skall vara en bondgård som levererar varor inte en tivoli/nöjesfällt.

    [Translation again: Do as Big Bob3 There must be a farm that supplies goods to an amusement / entertainment escapade.

    We'll hope to see many different styles of play, same as before :) Only now everything will be (hopefully) fair for everyone.

    It would be great though if you could post English in the EN Forums, if possible :)

    Latten]
  • Griffith (INT1)Griffith (INT1) Posts: 768
    edited 14.03.2014
    ty Latten thats what i been killing myself to tell these ppl, i called the optimum points by names of "flexible" (with deco, -25-50% happiness optimum, temp buildings less full upgraded buildings) and "not-flexible" (fully upgraded productions, no deco). and now you calling them "deco farm" and "industry farm" makes it clear that my guess wasn't wrong.

    and for ppl who still think they'll be at loss in 500% comparing to 300%, i remind you guys again, use your brain, these updates are related. you will "LESS" need dung from main farm in gourmet farm soon, that means in INDUSTRY FARM, you can make more APPLE/CHERRY ORCHARDS, than DUNG MAKERS AND FIELDS, and that will put you back to same profit as you were earning before at 300%.
    but then what's good of this update? it gives us the choice to have DECO FARM, cause till now with happiness system, DECO FARM = stupidity. & only optimum point for earning money was INDUSTRY FARM. which i personally didnt like cause then i see no point why im winning event decos and any other decos anyway if had to get rid of them sooner or later anyway!
    hope you guys get back to your senses, this update makes game much more interesting. ppl can choose their optimum happiness point as they want now, with as many deco or non if they want, THIS WASN'T AN OPTION OTHER THAN FOR STUPID PPL BEFORE THIS UPDATE.
Sign In to comment.