Join the official Goodgame Big Farm Discord today!
Are you looking for a community of like-minded farmers to discuss your farming experience with? Look no further than the GoodGame Big Farm Discord Server!
Our server is the perfect place to connect with other farmers from around the world. Whether you're looking to chat about strategy, share tips and tricks, or just make new friends, our community has got you covered.
And that's not all - as a member of our Discord server, you'll also have access to exclusive giveaways and other special events. It's the perfect way to stay up to date on all the latest news and updates from GoodGame Studios.
So what are you waiting for? Join the GoodGame Big Farm Discord Server today and start connecting with fellow farmers from all over the world. Just click here to join the fun!
Comments
So yes, If he won 4 gold medals, He will get a much tougher matchup the round after
Thats how it works, You do good results, you get harder matchup
You do bad results, u should get an advantageous matchup
So in the end, All the match up leans toward balance , fairness and the middle
Of course, there will be always elements that happens once in a while , that appears unfair or anything , but if you calculate everything, its far from being BAD
PS: I dont work for GG
By making the divisions level based, everyone would stand a good chance of getting a gold medals/diamonds with a bit of hard work.
Lets see how it is
As it stands 18 players out of 32 ( with 7 gold medals ) are level under 100
Its more than Half, that are there, So i have trouble accepting your theory that claims lower levels are THAT much at disadvantage
I do quite well in the normal course of events, but keep getting put up against members of the top co-ops in the Farmers League.
Oh well, it would have been nice.
And on our server there are plenty of 'low-lv' players with rank 1 (7 gold medals).
The only reason why you need to get a gold medal is because you need 1 so you can get the Season End Reward ... that problem could easily be solve by removing the gold-medal-restriction.
You dont need gold medals to get Title Promotion Rewards or Leaque End Rewards ... 'just' collecting enough points to get a title:
https://www.crazybigfarm.tk/events/farmers_league/title_overview.htm
And it seems to me there are more high-lv who are expressing concern about low-lv's ability to get gold medals than low-lv's players.
So maybe its an idea that high-lv played to win the first 2 events ... this way you have your 'lv-divsion' in no time.
But i'm fairly confident, nearly everyone have at least 1 gold at the end of this FL
Maybe there's even a no-gold yet component in the division making
But, I stand by my original point - no player can possibly be "of similar skill level" (GGS own words) as a player over 700 levels higher than them. At level 21 you only have one farm, so no ducks, donkeys etc. and to put them into a division with players that have all farms and likely level 9 large ducks, themed cows, lots more resources etc is quite simply wrong. There are lots of other lower levels players with gold medals - why not put them together to give them more of a chance than sticking them in with higher levels? Same with all the level 100's, 200's etc Medal count first (if you must) yes, then player level, and avoid players from the same co-op too (I know thats not always going to be possible) - surely that has to be fairer than it is currently.
Lv doesnt mean much ... and yes some are lv 21 ... but for how long ??? The way the game works prevent players from staying lv 21 for more than a few hours.
And i have seen several 'low-lv's' with a lot of large ducks and cows, and theme cows ... so 'low-lv' how low is that ??
So now we're back to: divide players into groups depending on how much gold/sw/booster they use.
There are good chanches that level 21 has won 4 gold medals in previous event.The CHWE.
So yes he or she will be matched up with higher levels.The better you preform the harder the contenders will be. Etc Etc.
I wonder how many players with a level above 750 are there,so how can you make it harder for that lower level player when it is mission impossible already. Unless you are spending ton,s of gold. But those who spend ton,s of gold are not complaining here.
It is the ordanairy daily player who maybe buy a bit gold every blue monday is in big disadvantagee,but a system what is not working well.
As i mentioned it before. GGS could have a nice,good and funny event from scratch,but they blewed it AGAIN
You start in a level 350-375 group for example and you stay there. No mixing around things. Who does not harvest gets nothing.
It cannot be that hard. Or would you like to beat a Formula1 race car on a pair of rollerskates because you won 4 races against people on rollerskates?? You think it is fair you have to race against a Formula1 car??
That is the WHOLE POINT. Nothing more nothing less
Even in formula 1
On a side note, Could you send a screenshot of your own division Iron Maiden?
In private message ? is it that bad?
put only that coop to play as i like. But i do play on the NL server aswell and have there now a level 178 farm. The discusion there is the same.
And what is BAD?? Beeing against things like they are running now?? Or you mean the ranking?? Well the player with the deepests pockets are mostly on the top rankings. But i never forgot that i had a small farm with a low level before. Some higher level players seems to forgotten that moment when They had a lower level.
And those competitions back to back and now a 42 day event running is a bit to much for peeople who DO have a job.
So when you don,t mind i will try to earn some real money in the real world instead of a useless Deco,
"We have to help each other all together between the farms" was their message to me.
I will always think it unfair that a level 21 player is in the same division as a level 797 - end of. The level 21 cant even get regular ducks until they are level 27, so to think they can get similar rp's during a cc is strange to me to say the very least,
But some think thats fair and that is their choice and opinion of course.
Its all rather pointless as no matter what the players say GGS will do things their own way - they always do, and of course their way will always benefit the gold buyers, otherwise there would be no point in buying gold and no revenue for GGS.
In my opinion, what it wouldn't be logical, even fair, is that a low level has more chances to get more diamonds that a high level one (for the main reason stated above concerning their current farm development) and that would be the case if the pairings would happen with people of similar levels instead of current number of medals/points accumulated to date, which seems to be the case currently.
In other events they divide by player level and give less of what ever prizes are given, so if implemented like that, it might be that the result of prizes gotten could be similar to what the current FL set up is (no advantage after all).
All that said, it would be nice that the need for a gold medal is removed to give all active players a slightly diamonds boost.
But, the horrible truth is no matter how they work it out the reward system in the FL is going to be unfair as long as they continue to have the divisions based on medals gained.
e.g.: The level 21 player in my last division was in with level 700+ (yes the 700+ did finish first and the level 21 bottom) There is no way on this earth that could be called fair when the score was based on rp's.and the division are supposed to group players of similar skills.
I finished 2nd and got a silver medal - happy, yes of course, but then I realised I'd got a much higher rp score than people of similar level to myself who had got gold medals because they were in 'easier' divisions. Was that fair? Probably not.
I bought the season pass so have more diamonds that someone that didnt but has more gold medals than me - I'm sure they would say thats not fair either (but in reality I dont see that as much different than gaining rp's by spinning the WoF or wwc coins by spinning the wheel)
Maybe a league system but based on level would work with the prizes adjusted (a bit like the cc's leagues) could work, but that too would have some players complaining.
Im sure GGS could have come up with a way that would have worked better for the players, but as long as it works for them and they keep the gold buyers happy (which they have to do etc etc etc) it wont change no matter how good any suggestions are.
And i wonder who is complaining and who is trying to give construtive criticism ... its usual in the eye of the beholder.
But getting steady medals, will probably matter more than the amount of gold medals at the end
Remember its Title that stands as top priority for rankings
I'll extrapolate/exagerate to show what i mean
Someone with 1 Gold and 41 Bronze medals
Would finish in front of Someone with 33 Gold medals and no other medals