Join the official Goodgame Big Farm Discord today!
Are you looking for a community of like-minded farmers to discuss your farming experience with? Look no further than the GoodGame Big Farm Discord Server!
Our server is the perfect place to connect with other farmers from around the world. Whether you're looking to chat about strategy, share tips and tricks, or just make new friends, our community has got you covered.
And that's not all - as a member of our Discord server, you'll also have access to exclusive giveaways and other special events. It's the perfect way to stay up to date on all the latest news and updates from GoodGame Studios.
So what are you waiting for? Join the GoodGame Big Farm Discord Server today and start connecting with fellow farmers from all over the world. Just click here to join the fun!
Comments
https://community.goodgamestudios.com/bigfarm/en/discussion/159336/update-august-16th-deep-sea-changes#latest
not satisfying at all since it does not address a real solid solution to the situation with the problem:
"oyster/clam/shrimp super low inefficient prices" vs "investment cost(super low ROR)" vs "catch cost (specially due to capacity items high cost and extra useless unavoidable contract prizes like karma etc)"
they just mentioned "hopes that we can make some alterations to provide a smoother progression in the development of contract levels and a faster pace of development."
Now I don't wanna be rude really by saying this, but we're not asking for "hopes" really here we're talking calculations and mathematics solid here, just get a damn smart employee please and see how much a joke it is regarding "ROR" by catching these 3 types o fishes right now and tell him to calculate how many oyster/shrimp/clam it takes to even give back the money for upgrading one trawler level 5 to level 6 (56mil dollars cost), they are not low profit, they are not even worth the investment now. So whatever that statement made by you guys even means, I just hope it includes fixing oyster/shrimp/clam prices vs investment cost vs cost of catch(and vs capacity items costs) at least. Not just empty words like "Hope". We're the ones who're "hoping" you listen to us, we don't need "hope in return" from u, we need action by you guys since you are the ones running the system not me or us otherwise we wouldn't "hope" anyway we'd take action ourselves and fix the prices already.
Regarding the other matter, also not as satisfying as expected since it does not address a real solid solution to "swordfish/salmon/cod" extinction either, they just mentioned "as with the balance of the fishing spots, alternatives have been and are being discussed." so nothing yet just empty words again. Give us "expected time/date", in short: realistic information, not "discussions" that's what we do here: "discussing", your job is to "set targets" and explain the "how(s) and what(s)" with detailed and solid information.
And regarding "Direct selling" again very unsatisfying what we got as a reply is " It is therefore possible that the direct sales of fish could make a return in future, but please bear in mind that this is not confirmed and that sell values will be considerably lower than previously if direct selling does make a comeback."
see GGS this is not a childish word-game we play here so please don't give us:
"possible" + "could" +"future" +"not confirmed"
I'm sorry for saying this as direct as i can but you do understand that these 4 words together only and only mean 1 thing right?! = bullshit!
So if you wanna do it, give us the time and details, and if not wanna do it then don't give us "bullshit" please. like "could" or "may" or "who knows" or "future" or "soon" or "not confirmed", or "maybe becomes confirmed" or this kinda crap that a 5 year old kid tells their teacher when they haven't done their homework. this is not "job description of a marketing team or CRM team" to say these kind of childish excuses.
Anyways though my final word is, as dissatisfying as your answer was, and as unprofessional as it was really coming from a big company( which was only full of words like "hopes" and "could" and "future", and in short non-solid information only), still I will thank you a bit at least for 'replying" even if the reply was basically empty words only.
This is my honest feedback and I hope you come with a much more "professional" reply to us next time, with the "decisions" and "exact and solid information including the "how" and "what" and "time" for the changes, or with a solid response as a "no" if nothing is gonna change anyway" so that if it's a "solid no change" at least we know and don't bother and waste our time here giving "solid feedback" about it anymore.
We are waiting for more than a week , and we still know nothing.
I would just like to take a moment to thank you for all your hard work and well thought out posts. It is great to have players like you that are able to wade through all the minutia (or lack there of) of GGS's puffed up "official announcements" and not get caught up in their smoke screens. Also the fact that you address these negligent issues. However, the thing I like most is that you actually try things first and then present facts based on real numbers.
Thanks so much for all you do for this forum.
I would also like to thank all the other helpful voices of this forum as well.
At least it gave me an excuse to bump this thread with this reply, so one good thing came out of it.
Yes, some are going click happy on the flag button. It is suppose to be used for abusive posts and spam, not posts that are venting or have a difference of opinion. These people are just making more work for the mods.
Flag me too....
Flag me too.....
I love flags. I have flags of 156 countries.......