Join the official Goodgame Big Farm Discord today!
Are you looking for a community of like-minded farmers to discuss your farming experience with? Look no further than the GoodGame Big Farm Discord Server!
Our server is the perfect place to connect with other farmers from around the world. Whether you're looking to chat about strategy, share tips and tricks, or just make new friends, our community has got you covered.
And that's not all - as a member of our Discord server, you'll also have access to exclusive giveaways and other special events. It's the perfect way to stay up to date on all the latest news and updates from GoodGame Studios.
So what are you waiting for? Join the GoodGame Big Farm Discord Server today and start connecting with fellow farmers from all over the world. Just click here to join the fun!
Comments
YAY SANTA!
YAY RUDOLPH!
YAY PRESENTS!
YAY PIGS IN BLANKETS!
YAY EARLY BEDTIME!
When I am reading through the posts and have one to quote, it takes me to the bottom of the page, but does not return me to the post I wanted to quote. This is really getting annoying having to look and look to see where I left off! It used to take me right back to the post I was reading. I've tried it with both IE and google chrome--yeah, yeah, I did all the clearing cashes, rebooting try to fix it stuff--does not work.
And using both browsers now, (it was only with IE), the typing is showing on the screen much later after I typed is and comes thru to the screen in bunches. Cash clearing and rebooting does not help either!
When I am reading through the posts and find on I want to comment on, I click on quote. Then as I continue to read, I find someone has already answered it and so I want to delete it from my message box-where I type in my messages, but it won't let me!!! I can delete the text, but not that blue background--unless I go to drafts and delete everything and start all over-annoying and a waste of time!.
If I go anywhere near the blue part when quoting messages in my reply, the cursor is stuck there and won't go anywhere on the white part again. The Forum screens just plain are not working properly! I have to wait even for my cursor to get in the right place!!!!
We need a better search!!!
We need the posts numbered!!
What's happening with the groups and how do they work!
I give up!!!
Typing is nuts tonight!!!
It says it is called More Questions Answered, but when I search for that thread, I do not find any new comments on it. And when I go to CM Kayla's bio, the comment is not listed on her page.
How does "agree" lower the discussion? Those who clicked "agree" will now probably click "like", do nothing or just post something like "i agree".
Also I wonder how GGS is doing analysis of peoples relationships.
That's some very "interesting" reasoning in the above anouncement.
In general both "agree" and "disagree" button had some information value, but that is also partially determined by the maturity of the public using these features. Nothing wrong with the features themselves imo. But it was obvious that some indivuduals were not able to cope with disagreement expressed in this way and were tempted to plunge themselves into tantrums on forums. So in this sense it is likely to help to keep forums civilised. Imo the need to remove them rather expresses the overall maturity of the comunity then anything else. So I guess there are point's which can be agreed uppon after all.
@RunsWivScissors (GB1) Thanks mate.
When the new group function is operational would you please throughly explain how it works and some applications that we might use it for? Thank You
The Disagree button was completely dysfunctional. If you don't agree then you need to post. What was it in particular that you disagreed with?; why?; what would you prefer instead? Useful contributions to a discussion.
imo
I disagree
In short, mature and reasoneable prevalent majority is penalised for silliness of tiny minority of immature users.
I avoided examples on purpose, but yay, why not. Will suggest two.
First: Sort of "yes/no" responses on ideas. Some would like to engage in simple "yes/no" "voting" if you will to express their appreciation of the post or parts of it, but don't want to be drawn into a larger debate or simply don't have time to detail why or with what exactly they disagree.
Second: Some posts, imo, occasionally have such a low quality, that simple "disagree" or similar as an expression of the reader's view and evaluation is enough.
(For analogy of both see some blog servers with options to evaluate article and resulting positive or negative "karma" of regular author.).
For both above situations "disagree" button provides a simple and non-confrontational option to provide feedback for those who bother enough to give it.
Possible abuse of anonymity is another issue completely.
malicious, and otherwise deprived and evil users, removing the Disagree button would seem to be a much easier solution to the problem, don't you think?
I wish I could just click "not sure you are right" button.